That's an interesting guess. I can see how this might well cause the problem I found. But that wasn't it. You are at something of a disadvantage here. There are two keys to unlocking this particular puzzle. One is a familiarity with the precise configuration of the mid- to late-1920s Chickering wippen. The other is some experience with Pratt, Read parts of a few decades back. This company had only a casual acquaintance with incidentals such as the precise specifications of various action parts and an even more casual acquaintance with basic quality control. In their experience as long as things like hammershank knuckles were mostly glued to the shanks that was good enough. Their size and precise location were both unimportant incidentals. ddf Delwin D Fandrich Piano Design & Fabrication 6939 Foothill Court SW, Olympia, Washington 98512 USA Phone 360.515.0119 Cell 360.388.6525 del at fandrichpiano.com ddfandrich at gmail.com -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of John Delacour Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 9:45 AM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Weekend puzzler At 09:23 -0700 16/07/2011, Delwin D Fandrich wrote: >Nope. But we're warming up. > >ddf > >>Gene Nelson >> >>Rep lever too low, jack too far under knuckle, knuckle fabric fibers >>resisting jack escapement? How about the leather or cloth drop button on the repetition lever catching on the inside of the hammer rail? JD
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC