I've encountered this several times now with grand pianos. I
level strings. Then for each unison I hold the hammer up
against the strings by pressing upward on the jack tender, and
pluck the strings. The ones that ring aren't being damped by
the hammer. The ones that don't ring are being damped,
indicating (supposedly) that the hammer is "high" under that
string. Trouble is, I get the indication that all the hammers
in the low tenor are high on the right. Yet when tipping the
front of the action up and viewing the strike points (which
appear just above the flange screws from this vantage point),
they appear straight across.
( _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ )
If I then file the right side of each hammer so that all 3
strings of each unison are damped equally when holding the
hammers against them, then look at them again from the front,
they appear like the teeth of a giant rip saw (|\ |\ |\ |\
|\ |\ |\ |\ , but imagine the line slanting to the right --
the strike point-- slants only about a third as much as the
backslash.) But when I leveled strings, nothing told me that
the right string of each unison was low, especially not that far
low.
This problem doesn't occur in the section with
non-angle-bored hammers nor in the capo sections. So I'm
wondering if, because of the angled hammers (not in line with
the shank), the shank flexes when pressing up on the jack,
causing the hammer to lean to the left, and giving me a false
indication of how the top of the hammer is shaped.
I've also had situations when, after spacing hammers, some
of them still get thrown aside slightly on a hard blow, so that
one unison string doesn't sound as loudly as the others. In
other words, the angle bore or something else is causing the
hammer to travel or lean on a hard blow.
--David Nereson, RPT
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC