Well, you are certainly free to pursue whatever path you think best. I'll just say again: the Google Group already exists, it works, it's easy for most to subscribe, it preserves and promotes the same sense email community, and there are a bunch of us already there. Come join us. For *free* to all comers, at no charge to the PTG. Subscribe by sending a blank email to this address: pianotech+subscribe at googlegroups.com We've been through this twice already, and there's been no material change since the first time. The pianotech list has been *replaced* by my.ptg.organd is going away. This is now a refugee operation. Jim On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Horace Greeley <hgreeley at sonic.net> wrote: > Hi, Jim, > > > On 2/25/2013 8:10 PM, Jim Moy wrote: > >> No, because running a server that you control is quite beyond the scope >> of simply administering the control panel of a hosted listserv. >> > > I respectfully disagree in part. > > If one chooses to own one's own hardware, provide software, do the > installation, server management/maintenance, and all the other cruft that > goes along with it, the you are correct... > > On the other hand, if one chooses to contract with one's ISP, or other > service provider, for the provision of the base server and its related > software, then the main choices one has to make (if one is using "mailman", > anyway) is does one prefer to have a "closed" or an "open" list...that is, > does the administrator(s) choose to have to personally act on every > subscription request, or, do they allow the built-in controls in the > mailman application to handle those basic chores for them. If the contract > is properly written, the service provider even backs up both the data and > the server, so that there is a level of service provided that is not > available with either Facebook or Google. Other than that, the primary > responsibility of the administrator(s) would be to be in reasonable contact > with the service provider when users report things like spam/etc to see > what can be blocked by the co-located spam/AV software. > > Only FWIW, from watching and reading these discussions as they have come > and gone over the last couple of years, and (hopefully) putting politics > aside, shutting off something as antique and low-tech as mailman in favor > of any replacement (whether HL, Facebook, Google, what-have-you) that > requires relatively fast end-user machines with at least ADSL2+ or > broadband connections for the web interfaces to work properly automatically > cuts off many of the very users who have not only contributed much to the > profession over time, but who also either have slow connections (the U.S. > is now #10 in the "industrialized west" for internet connection speed and > reliability), or slow machines, or both, or who don't have the time to > spend waiting while the latest version of Java downloads and installs so > that the ads on the page can display. > > This really isn't rocket science...nowhere close. Frankly, it's so easy > and cost effective (as opposed to all of the other solutions which have > been suggested so far), that I'm only surprised that no one has pointed out > that the very simple and ultimately easiest solution is simply to start up > another mailman instance with another service provider. The base server > doesn't have to be very large...an old PIV running virtually any > semi-modern version of Linux can run mailman in about 4 Gb RAM. The whole > archive for both pianotech and the old caut list is under 150MB in > (compressed) size...and, looking quickly at my "attachments" directories, > even if the now-removed attachments are somehow magically replaced, there > would be only 15 - 20 Gb storage required to hold the whole thing. Even if > this were to be put up in some portion of the Amazon S3 cloud, this kind of > thing might run as much as $25/month to run 24/7/365...even if it turned > out to be $50/month, that's only $600/year...or, call it $1,000 per year to > be conservative. While I run a number of Linux and other OSes on different > boxes for different purposes, for things like this I rely on my ISP and/or > one of the Amazon cloud-based services to handle web, mail, and database > servers rather than trying to maintain production equipment myself. It's > far more cost effective and makes much more efficient use of my own time > and energy. It's also cheap. > > It's really very, very simple. Properly configured, mailman is > effectively self-contained and reliant. Mail comes in and goes out. > Attachments are properly delivered with the appropriate EM. After their > initial subscription, users do not have to sign in, wait for web pages, > click on multiple links to where they are going, and, don't get lost in a > maze of sub-menus/groups/etc. Archives can be be created automagically. > It just works. If the supporting services are contracted with a competent > service provider, the human input to the whole system is minimal. > > Paul's question is the right one to be asking; and, the direct answer is > that, as noted above, it depends on which of the above-noted routes one > takes. Basically, there's no competent technical or budgetary reason to > throw this list under the bus. > > Anyway, I'm just surprised that no one has suggested this previously. > > Kind regards. > > Horace > > > Jim >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:11 PM, paul bruesch <paul at bruesch.net <mailto: >> paul at bruesch.net>> wrote: >> >> Wouldn't it be just as easy to run a mailman listserver? OK, maybe >> not, but... >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Jim Moy <jim at moypiano.com >> <mailto:jim at moypiano.com>> wrote: >> >> A perfectly valid objection to the "cloud computing" way of >> things. >> >> If the pianotech run on Google servers goes away some day, how >> can you guarantee its contents were preserved for the future, >> in the way we are able with the Mailman list archives on the >> server we control? >> >> It seems like it would be a good idea to set up a machine >> subscriber to the Google Group that automatically stores the >> emails it receives in an archive that is under our control... >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Susan Kline <skline at peak.org >> <mailto:skline at peak.org>> wrote: >> >> There's something else -- I don't trust the likes of >> Google or Yahoo at all, even though >> I'm part of a big Yahoo group. And Facebook --- why not >> just let a bunch of corporate >> jackals into your private home, unlock everything, let >> them take whatever they want >> and piss on the rest? >> >> Susan, now getting old and cranky >> >> Terry Beckingham wrote: >> >>> Well, I thought I had Google groups figured out, but I >>> guess I was wrong. >>> >>> It appears that the only way I can send to Google groups >>> is to go onto the web and log into my Google account and >>> send from there. >>> >>> I don't like going to the web if I don't have to, because >>> I do not have high speed. I use Eudora for my email and >>> everything comes directly into my Eudora. I can have >>> Google forward from my Gmail account to my other address, >>> but I can't send to Google groups from my Eudora. >>> >>> Am I missing something here? Is there a way to send from >>> my Eudora to Google groups without logging onto my Google >>> account on the web? >>> >>> I'm frustrated. >>> >>> Terry Beckingham >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20130226/496577b1/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC