Will, So eloquent as always. It would be impossible for me to agree any more than I do. 100% is 100%. Paul Bruesch Stillwater, MN On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Encore Pianos <encorepianos at metrocast.net>wrote: > Hi Kent: > > I would like to engage some of your comments, and will start by saying that > you are not of the bad guys, so nothing following is directed personally at > you. > > I agree that the closing of mailman by the powers that be is a lost cause. > They have never really listened to us, and they give us no reason to > believe > that they will start now. It is fait accompli as of April 1. A great many > of us have recognized that and are moving towards a new list elsewhere, as > evidenced by the mechanics and discussion of moving to Googletech. We are > the bastard offspring they have created, and we are leaving home to go > someplace where we are wanted and respected. > > The protest is a lost cause in the sense that it will not bring back > Pianotech. The unsubscribing to HL is the point of the protest. It is > there to state that the way that the closing of the Pianotech forum has > been > handled over the past 2 years has been divisive, destructive, - and > avoidable. There is a cost to the way that the board has made its choices. > It is clear to many that the board has not acted in good faith towards the > participants of Pianotech. We had been lead to believe that other options > would be explored that were exclusive of Pianotech or HL, and it is clear > that any statements to that effect have never been more than window > dressing. > > I believe that the majority of participants in Pianotech would have > welcomed > a replacement for Pianotech that works as simply as it does, and adds some > features that are the byproduct of software evolution. Improvements aside, > the fundamental architecture of the interface of the HL site still > functions > like it was designed by a bunch of 12 year old boys at recess. I can still > recall how my heart fell to the floor the first time I opened the HL site > and I thought, "Oh.... My..... God... What a piece of shit. How could > they > do this to us?" > > I did not want to use it then, and nothing they have done to improve it is > enough to make me want to use it now. That's where most of us are, and we > are not Luddites. We recognize the blindingly obvious, while others choose > to avoid it. > > Here is where I will disagree with you most strongly, Kent: " So, I would > like to express the opinion that an alternative to abandoning my.ptg would > be instead to sign up for my.ptg and continue to put the pressure on for it > to work correctly." It will never function as well as PIanotech without a > ground floor rewrite and redesign of the interface. There is no reason to > believe that HL has either the capability or interest in doing so. Nor > have we been given any reason to believe that our board even wants such a > thing or considers it important. They do not give a damn about what we > want. What evidence is there that this attitude will change anytime soon? > They've done their dirty deed, and they can go back to sleep now. It's > over. > > Utter mediocrity has won. These people are the face of the organization > PTG > and dishonor it with their smallness. That is why some people are choosing > to leave PTG, and why so many are working to create a viable and enjoyable > alternative replacement for Pianotech. > > Most respectfully yours, > > Will Truitt > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20130227/e803084c/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC