<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 10/24/=
01 1:59:16 AM Central Daylight Time, Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-=
LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Ja jøss !!... arent those=
like monster needles.. I thought I used fat
<BR>needles from time to time... but have never gone below a number 5.
<BR>Generally you see number 7's for sale in the piano supply catalouges
<BR>over here. Number 17 needles Wim ?? I didnt know they made them th=
at
<BR>thin. Sure you didnt mean number 7's ?
<BR>
<BR>--
<BR>Richard Brekne
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>Several of you mentioned #7 as opposed to #17 (Roger uses #3 or #4). Per=
haps that is the right size, ( #7). But since I saw #17, I presumed th=
at was the right size. I have been using #17 sharp needles quite successfull=
y for several years, so I never bothered to look for anything else. I will g=
o look for #7's, and see how they are different.
<BR>
<BR>Wim
<BR></FONT></HTML>