<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><HTML><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Gen=
eva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2"><BR>
In a message dated 4/17/05 3:54:15 AM, b98tu@t-online.de writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE CITE STYLE="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px" TYPE="CITE"></FONT><FONT COLOR="#0=
00000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSERIF" SIZE="2">If one wants to<BR>
raise objection at a patent process because he believes that he found that<B=
R>
same method before, he must prove that he made it available to the public<BR=
>
before the patent filing.<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSE=
RIF" SIZE="2"><BR>
<BR>
What if I tune a piano and my tuning accidently locates exact neuronal regio=
ns, where time delayed<BR>
signals fall in minimal beat sum states? I mean, not on purpose. =
; Just by happenchance my tuning duplicates an OnlyPure tuning? <BR>
<BR>
Then what? Can I be sued? <BR>
<BR>
Keep in mind that it would not be intentional. (I would never intenti=
onally attempt to locate exact nueronal regions so as to create minimal beat=
sum rates. I mean, I might have BEFORE it was patented, but to intentionall=
y do so now would be unethical.)<BR>
<BR>
PianoTunaGuy</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Geneva" FAMILY="SANSSER=
IF" SIZE="2"></FONT></HTML>