<html> <font size=3>At 09:53 PM 09/10/2000 +1000, you wrote:<br> Ron,<br> Thanks for reiterating on the lower friction effect from a smaller knuckle.<br> I should have gone into greater detail in my response but was pressed for time<br> and figured your statement would be remembered and just left it at 'lower friction'.<br> <br> I still have the shanks separated in regards to roller height and will get someone on it tomorrow.<br> I would imagine there is a tolerance granted for sanity purposes. As this is my first encounter<br> with close examination of this height.  I will maintain a 0.010 window (+/- .005 from average height,<br> this set's average is .645; so .640 to .650, it might get tighter as the work progresses). I included<br> the thickness of the shank assuming that the shanks are uniform because I only have a thickness<br> gauge and not a height gauge. I'll check the shanks' thicknesses tomorrow.<br> Tolerance suggestions welcome.<br> <br> It's always something . . . <br> <br> Regards,</font><br> <div>Jon Page,   piano technician</div> <div>Harwich Port, Cape Cod, Mass.</div> <div><a href="mailto:jonpage@mediaone.net" EUDORA=AUTOURL>mailto:jonpage@mediaone.net</a></div> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ </html>