<html>
<body>
Tom, <br><br>
I realize we're talking about two different things here and I agree with
you up to a point! \\\\<br><br>
I do a lot of concert work and if I'm REQUIRED to "stand by",
I'm going to charge them for it. If they don't like it, find someone
else! JMNSHO! :-) <br><br>
Avery <br><br>
At 06:00 PM 2/24/2006, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<font face="Arial, Helvetica" size=2>In a message dated 2/24/2006 4:26:06
P.M. Central Standard Time, tubist@swbell.net writes:<br>
</font>
<dl>
<dd>Here's the question: is it reasonable to charge something for the two
hours<br>
<dd>of downtime?<br><br>
</dl>No. <br>
<br>
Change the schedule to work better for you, or accept the limitations put
on you. Or simply don't take the job. But to charge a school
system (or anybody, for that matter) for doing nothing...just doesn't
seem right to me. Personally, I would never do it. Nothing is
ever perfect. Not everything works out to your advantage.
That's life.<br>
<br>
Next year who knows what the schedule will be? Maybe next year you
can tune them all right in a row. But I can guarantee you if you
charge them for the downtime this year, you'll never find out: it
will be somebody else tuning their pianos. <br>
<br>
Tom Sivak<br>
Chicago</blockquote></body>
</html>