<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Dave:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I really know nothing about RCT but I can tell you what I like about
TuneLab Pro.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1> I like the moving bar display. It is easy to see, its
meaning is obvious and it doesn't make me dizzy.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2> I like the spectrum display. It is great for tuning at
the top of pianos. It shows you graphically the frequencies that make up
"false" beats, and it really helps in pitch raises.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>3> I like the fact that I can read inharmonicity on any notes
rather than proscribed ones. That way if one note I'm reading has a funky
sound, I can read another close by.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>4> I like the fact that setting the stretch uses real life terms
like 8:4 octaves, or 4:2 octaves etc. I can relate to that better than a
stretch #5.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>5> I like the fact that I can decide which partials for the
program to listen for. I can also change partials on-the-fly. If I
get a funky 6th partial, I can switch to the 7th or 8th and the inharmonicity
offset is changed to get the same result.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>6> I like being able to tell the program where the scale break is,
and measure that break so it can create a tuning that really fits the
piano.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>7> I like the stability. I've had every version from the
first TuneLab97 to the latest TuneLab Pro and none of them has ever crashed my
system. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Well, you get the idea. I've used TuneLab since just after it was
released. I think you'd be happy with it. Of course I think you
could be happy with RCT, SAT or Verituner too. I've just found what works
for me.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>dave<BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR
***********<BR><BR>On 3/31/2003 at 12:11 AM Dave Foster wrote:</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Well, the PDA of choice is still being researched
extensively by myself. I've done alot of comparison shopping of PDA's
and I'm still looking. But that's really isn't the issue. So far,
I've heard a lot about RCT and Tunelab. Many more poeple seem to prefer
RCT, though. I can only imagine that it is going to be a slightly better
program then TuneLab because of it's userablity, functionality, and
price. But is the price difference REALLY worth it? If I'm able to
get a good, stable pitch-raise from TuneLab that is pretty much indifferent
from RCT's pitch-raise then why spend the extra money. I've been tuning
about 4 years and I've established a pretty good aural routine that I
like. I really just want the ETD to help with pitch-raises and
hard-to-hear tonality. I'm not really looking to change my way of
tuning, at least not yet. So, again, is the extra money for RCT really
worth it?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dave Foster</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jgrassi@silverlink.net href="mailto:jgrassi@silverlink.net">Jeannie
Grassi</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=foster29@earthlink.net
href="mailto:foster29@earthlink.net">'Dave Foster'</A> ; <A
title=pianotech@ptg.org href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">'Pianotech'</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, March 30, 2003 12:01
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: Pocket PC</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=220240017-30032003><FONT
face=Arial>Dave,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=220240017-30032003><FONT face=Arial>In my opinion there is
no comparison. RCT is by far the way to go! You won't regret
it. Dell is offering really great deals on their PDAs right now.
I don't know how long they will have such good prices.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=220240017-30032003><FONT
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=220240017-30032003><FONT
face=Arial>jeannie</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>Jeannie Grassi, RPT<BR>Associate Editor, Piano Technicians
Journal<BR><A
href="mailto:jgrassi@silverlink.net">mailto:jgrassi@silverlink.net</A>
</FONT></P></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> <A
href="mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org">pianotech-bounces@ptg.org</A>
[mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Dave
Foster<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, March 27, 2003 6:50 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
pianotech@ptg.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Pocket PC<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>List, hopefully this summer I will upgrading
(in my opinion ungrading) to a Pocket PC ETD. I have some experience
with TuneLab, and absolutly no knowledge of the Reyburn Cybertuner.
I'm sure this has been a subject of many discussions, and I apologize for
the repetition of this topic, but what are some of the
advantages/disadvantages of one or the other? I would like to find
out some of your opinions of these programs and what might your
recommendations be.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I will be testing and playing around with
these programs in the upcoming MARC in Pittsburgh, and I would like to
know a bit more about them so that I don't look at them
unknowingly.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dave Foster</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT size=2
Arial></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>
<PRE>
_____________________________
David M. Porritt
dporritt@mail.smu.edu
Meadows School of the Arts
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX 75275
_____________________________</PRE>