<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SERIF" FACE="Times New Roman" LANG="0"><I>In a message dated 8/15/2002 8:36:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time, fordpiano@earthlink.net writes:<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></I><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Subj:<B>Re: More dip in bass </B><BR>
Date:8/15/2002 8:36:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time<BR>
From:<A HREF="mailto:fordpiano@earthlink.net">fordpiano@earthlink.net</A><BR>
Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A><BR>
To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A><BR>
<I>Sent from the Internet </I><BR>
<BR>
Phil</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SERIF" FACE="Times New Roman" LANG="0"> This thread is good food for thought. I for one consider letoff an essential part of the equation( so does every one else) that should be added to the list below in the no. 4 spot.<BR>
One thing I'd like to add is that I set very close let-offs. May be closer than many factory specs because pianist like tonal control and power. I learned this from Norm Neblett years ago. How close? 2mm in the bass ,1.5 tenor and 1 in the trebles. My blow is usually 1 3/4" in stwys. If I was setting wider let-offs in the bass couldn't I theoretically set the dip shallower?as escapement is happening sooner and deeper in the treble cause it's happening later.<BR>
Hmm Maybe I'm just getting tired. Later<BR>
Dale<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"><BR>
Phil,<BR>
I'm not sure what you mean by working blow distance to aftertouch off of your<BR>
dip. As I see it there are three things we are playing with:<BR>
<BR>
1. Blow distance<BR>
2. Keydip<BR>
3. Aftertouch<BR>
<BR>
If all the parts in the action were exactly the same and the regulation of<BR>
those parts was exactly the same, then if blow distance and keydip were the<BR>
same then aftertouch would be the same. Since this doesn't happen in reality<BR>
some compromise has to be made somewhere. Basically you can keep two of the<BR>
above the same but the third one has got to give. So you've got to decide for<BR>
yourself which one has got to give. Dale has said that he holds keydip<BR>
constant and varies blow distance to achieve consistent aftertouch. That's<BR>
certainly legitimate and many people do that. I (and Bill) prefer to keep the<BR>
blow distance uniform and vary the keydip to assure consistent aftertouch. I<BR>
haven't heard anyone advocating maintaining uniform blow distance and keydip<BR>
and letting the aftertouch vary, but that is another option (this is actually<BR>
what I learned, and maybe what many of us learned - set the blow distance, set<BR>
the dip with a block, and you're done. The consequence of this in the real<BR>
world is inconsistent aftertouch).<BR>
<BR>
Phil F<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SERIF" FACE="Times New Roman" LANG="0"><I><BR>
</I></FONT></HTML>