<HTML><HTML>In a message dated 11/3/2004 1:16:3= 5 AM Eastern Standard Time, pianolover88@hotmail.com writes: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT= : 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Of course I would have seen the= insert only AFTER having punched Nader's chad (if he were my preferred candidate), and so my ballot would be<= BR> invalidated if I were to punch out any other chad.  In contrast, my fri= end's absentee ballot information included a salmon-colored notice inserted carefully between the pages towards the front of the booklet, where the presidential candidates were listed, so it would be impossible not to see it= before mistakingly punching Nader's chad.  Why were her materials assem= bled with clarity and user friendliness in mind, and why were mine assembled to<B= R> be unclear, even deceptive?  My part of town is heavily Democrat. = Hers is heavily Republican</BLOCKQUOTE>    Please have THAT investigated!!!!. Obviously, someone biased as= semled the voting materials.  I can attest that there are many ways to = misguide voters.  My guess as to why election officials would do this, = is that they are blindly over zealous for their candidate. These people have= no right to work in an election office. They are not worthy, because they c= annot or will not be impartial. They have no regard for the sanctity of voti= ng. They have no respect for other's choices. They have no interest in fairn= ess.    I despatetly want my choice for president to win, but when I= am working for the county, I PUT MY OWN PREFERENCES ASIDE</FO= NT></B= > AND WORK FOR THE VOTING PEOPLE, not my own pr= esidential preference, reguardless of who they vote for and I dont preso= nally agree with their choice!   What IS wrong with those people??????</HTML>