<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 1/8/01 10:23:27 PM Central Standard Time, <BR>mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com (Farrell) writes:
<BR>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=4 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Kimball</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">
<BR>How on earth did you guess. I should add that the tuning pins were driven to <BR>the proper depth, the coils were neat and uniform and the feel was firm but <BR>easily moved without any jumping. It was easy to tune compared especially to <BR>some of the pianos mentioned recently on this List, including Steinway, both <BR>grand and upright. There was not a hint of false beating. The high <BR>inharmonicity scale actually works to my advantage in the way I tune both <BR>temperament and octaves. In short, I had no complaint nor any reason to think <BR>poorly of this piano.
<BR>
<BR>To me, it looked like one of Kimball's pianos from the Chicago factory but <BR>the tag I read clearly stated that it had been made in French Lick, IN with <BR>the case being made in Jasper (where they apparently still do make piano <BR>cases). Everyone knows that their quality control and workmanship went down <BR>drastically during the '70's (and maybe a little before and after too) but <BR>that it did recover in the last few years of production.
<BR>
<BR>But couldn't that be said of Steinway too during its CBS ownership? To me, <BR>the Teflon bushings were more of a scapegoat for numerous defects in <BR>workmanship. The materials were sometimes questionable but the workmanship <BR>made matters much worse. I think you could say the same for Kimball when it <BR>was at its worst.
<BR>
<BR>One long term client of mine who is also a good friend who throws an annual <BR>wine and cheese party has a Kimball Viennese edition upright. He hires a <BR>pianist to play for the event. At that last event, I heard the owner ask the <BR>pianist what he thought of the piano. His answer was "rich tone". It really <BR>surprised me because I was thinking exactly the same thing.
<BR>
<BR>Everyone knows about the bad ones but I think its important to note that as a <BR>company, Kimball was capable of and did produce some good pianos. Their old <BR>grands had a really rich tone like none other and their really old uprights <BR>were very well made although their brass flanges were not easy to service.
<BR>
<BR>Coincidentally, my 3rd appointment of the day was another Kimball, this time <BR>a "Kimballette" from the Chicago factory in the 1950's. It had a direct blow <BR>action but had keys with a big step in them. It was very out of tune and <BR>hardly played at all because there was so much lost motion that the hammers <BR>just bobbled against the strings. The keys appeared unlevel and floating. <BR>There was so much lost motion in the pedals that they barely worked. It <BR>sounded terrible and was unplayable.
<BR>
<BR>Now, I have 90 minutes and can decide to turn it down, badmouth the <BR>manufacturer and make the customer feel stupid for even having this thing in <BR>his living room and thinking it is a piano or I can use the knowledge and <BR>skills I have built over the years and make this instrument capable of <BR>playing music. I wouldn't earn much money doing the first option but I would <BR>doing the second.
<BR>
<BR>So, in checking things out, I see that the capstans need a full turn or more. <BR> It could use cleaning but no keys were sticking so I decided to do a capstan <BR>adjustment only. The alignment was good and there were no rattling flanges <BR>and the let-off was reasonable close. Taking up the lost motion also made <BR>the dampers lift properly. But there is no capstan tool I know of that will <BR>even reach these capstans, not to mention all of the tedious turning.
<BR>
<BR>The best technique is to pull the key out and give the capstan the estimated <BR>turn easily with the key in hand. Just as in tuning, making a technique like <BR>this work requires being able to make a good estimate. The goal is to move <BR>through all of the capstans quickly and easily, avoiding stress and to pick <BR>out just a few here or there that were a bit over or under turned.
<BR>
<BR>As often happens, when I finish, the customer knows it and comes out saying, <BR>"Now that's *beautiful*!" I never get tired of hearing that. He sat down to <BR>play and I heard the word "yes" and the sighs and/or moans of pleasure that I <BR>hear from nearly anyone who plays a piano I have tuned and serviced. He told <BR>me he was glad he had found me because he had about given up hope that this <BR>piano would ever sound and play right. He said, in fact, "All the other <BR>tuners I ever got *hated* it".
<BR>
<BR>Well, I didn't hate it at all, obviously, but what I really did enjoy was the <BR>reaction of the customer to 90 minutes of good solid technique applied <BR>efficiently and effectively. I also enjoyed the nice 3 figure check that he <BR>wrote for my work. To paraphrase Liberace, "I hated that Kimball all the way <BR>to the bank".
<BR>
<BR>Bill Bremmer RPT
<BR>Madison, Wisconsin</FONT></HTML>