<html>
<font size=3>The system is pretty simple and straight forward. I don't
see what everyone's<br>
objections are. Why is a person or institution not suppose to benefit
financially<br>
from an idea or product. Do you have something against Capitalism?<br>
<br>
It is easy to copy, but the patent laws could get you into trouble if
discovered.<br>
<br>
Perhaps one reason for 'getting with the program' is that they want to
maintain<br>
a standard/procedure and a guarantee of your compliance.<br>
<br>
Don't make a big deal about it. Ask for the application, sign and return
it,<br>
view the literature and decide if you wish to pursue it. No money
spent<br>
except for postage. Then if you install the system, you send them a
minimal<br>
royalty. It a no-brainer.<br>
<br>
I believe it's not paid until completion (customer) or sale of the
piano,<br>
so someone other than you pays the royalty.<br>
<br>
If your biggest objection is just the royalty, then you're just being
cheap.<br>
Someone put time and energy into this product and would like to reap
<br>
the benefits. I have no problem with paying someone their due.<br>
<br>
If it were your idea, would you just give it away? I think not.<br>
<br>
Jon Page<br>
<br>
At 09:40 PM 02/15/2000 +0100, you wrote:<br>
>Exactly my point... in the end everything Wapin is trying to protect
for its own<br>
>profit will come out.. and if its really worthwhile... there will be
the<br>
>inevitable copies, variations etc etc ad absurdum. Better to
compete on the<br>
>level of quality, workmanship, support and all these positives. That
road can be<br>
>started on right away by loosening up on enough detail so that
interested techs<br>
>(and there are many) are not scared away by this particular
combination of<br>
>expense and prior secrecy. Say what you like... my opinion is Wapin
does<br>
>themselves no favour by not offering a reasonalby complete
technical<br>
>explaination.<br>
><br>
>Be that as it may.. the patent office is open for viewing and I
personally am<br>
>going to download a copy of whatever I find on Wapin and figure it
out on my<br>
>own.<br>
><br>
>ANRPiano@AOL.COM wrote:<br>
><br>
>> In a message dated 2/14/00 7:13:05 PM Central Standard
Time,<br>
>> bake@spa.att.ne.jp writes:<br>
>><br>
>> << It is very expensive to apply for,<br>
>> aquire, and maintain a patent and that cost is reflected
in the cost of an<br>
>> installation license fee ($325 BTW). >><br>
>><br>
>> Yes, but, I would be willing to install the Wapin in all the
pianos I<br>
>> rebuild, but not at $325 per installation. IMHO I would
think it would be<br>
>> advantageous to the Wapin folks if their technology became the
standard for<br>
>> all pianos instead of rarely used. Look no further than
the PC and the MAC.<br>
>> It is simple economics instead of receiving a couple thousand
from my shop<br>
>> each year for two dozen installations they will receive
$0.<br>
>><br>
>> But that is their concern, not mine.<br>
>><br>
>> Andrew Remillard<br>
><br>
>--<br>
>Richard Brekne<br>
>Associate PTG, N.P.T.F.<br>
>Bergen, Norway<br>
> </font><br>
<div>Jon Page, piano technician</div>
<div>Harwich Port, Cape Cod, Mass.</div>
<div><a href="mailto:jonpage@mediaone.net" EUDORA=AUTOURL>mailto:jonpage@mediaone.net</a></div>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
</html>