<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" link="#0000EE" vlink="#551A8B" alink="#FF0000">   harvey wrote: <blockquote TYPE=CITE>Richard, I admit that the "P" reference instead of a brand name eluded me. Regardless... On #1, are you sure you're not experiencing the "growing action bracket" phenomenon? This condition is -not- exclusive to older actions with pot metal brackets, and, until it is experienced/diagnosed, can cause quite a bit of head-scratching and frustration.  </blockquote> Grin... Now heres one I havent heard of before. You mind extrapolating a bit on what this is all about ?? <blockquote TYPE=CITE>  On #2, not to insult your integrity, but have you checked the "phantom" gliders in the section? If not, you have a suspension bridge on your hands. I've also noticed that with newer, thinner keyframes, some flexing occurs during subsequent action in/out procedures. Although I can't explain -why-, I always check bedding at intervals while doing additional regulation work. Just stray thoughts...</blockquote> No insult taken... Does no harm to double and triple check. Even the best of the best can miss a trick. And I certainly have a long way to go to catch up with those guys. Will double check tommorrow, tho I dont think this is the problem. I'd like to hear some disscussion about the "springy rail" idea and eventually what to do about it. Its a long stretch in this section between action brackets..... Jim B is cautious here.. comments ?? <blockquote TYPE=CITE>   </blockquote> Richard Brekne I.C.P.T.G.  N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway </body> </html>