<html>
Hi David,<br>
A quick and easy check of where the friction may be coming from.
Measure the strike wt. of a few hammers. Find one or two old hammers with
similar strike wts. Install them, then remeasure the friction. This
will give you an indication of the knuckle friction, old vs
new. PS Make sure the CP friction is similar.<br>
These type of comparative measurements can be illuminating.<br>
A habit I have started, that I have found helpful, Is to rebush/resize
and fully rebuild the keybed before starting touch weight analysis.
This I feel is a fixed component with regards to friction. If the BR pin
hole is correct, and there is .002" clearance at the BR bushing, and
.005" at the FR bushing. Then I have removed one more variable
from the before and after evaluation.<br>
I then do a few samples, wippens only, and compare, then finally
hammers and shanks. For the samples I just use all the C's.<br>
Your friction seems a little high for me. 10-12gm range is where I
like to see it. But this is only one of the components.<br>
Taking a lot of little steps, like this, just helps to stop me from
getting lost. <G><br>
<br>
Roger<br>
<br>
<br>
At 10:37 AM 8/26/01 -0700, you wrote: <br>
<font size=2><blockquote type=cite cite>Friction was pretty uniform
ranging from 15-12 g from bottom to top. slightly high due to heavy
Steinway hammers probably. I do check the knuckle heights since you
mentioned that on a post some time ago. They were very consistent
on this set. The acceleration characteristic was there after I
re-weighed the piano for uniform balance weight.</font><br>
<font size=3> <br>
</font><font size=2>David Love</font><blockquote><font size=4>
<dl>
<dd>----- Original Message ----- <font size=4>
<dd>From:</b><font size=4>
<a href="mailto:jon.page@verizon.net"><font size=4>Jon Page</a><font size=4> <font size=4>
<dd>To:</b><font size=4> <a href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org"><font size=4>pianotech@ptg.org</a><font size=4> <font size=4>
<dd>Sent:</b><font size=4> August 26, 2001 5:00 AM<font size=4>
<dd>Subject:</b><font size=4> Re: hammer acceleration<br>
<br>
</font><font size=3>
<dd>At 06:04 PM 08/25/2001 -0700, you wrote:</font><font size=2><blockquote type=cite cite>
<dd>Roger:</font><font size=3>
<dd> </font><font size=2>
<dd>The action is workable. The key ratio is .53 for naturals and .55 for sharps. The knuckles are 17mm and the dip is not excessive. The caps are centered under the heels. It's not grossly out, don't misunderstand me. The action feels nice. I just noticed that the acceleration rate was different and have noticed this variation periodically. In this case once the static friction is broken the hammer begins to accelerate more quickly than many I have weighed off. Anyway, on to the next one. I'm tempted to try S&S parts on the next one I do, I'm glad to hear you were happy with the quality control.</font><font size=3>
<dd> </font><font size=2>
<dd>David Love</font></blockquote><font size=3>
<dd>Could it be that the ones which accelerate faster also have a lower friction or Balance Weight?
<dd>Check knuckle height, there may be a noticeable difference from note to note;
<dd>another process prior to shank installation is measuring knuckle height and
<dd>grouping similar ones together.<br>
<br>
<dd>Regards,
<dd>Jon Page, piano technician
<dd>Harwich Port, Cape Cod, Mass.
<dd><a href="mailto:jon.page@verizon.net" eudora="autourl">mailto:jon.page@</a>verizon<a href="mailto:jon.page@verizon.net" eudora="autourl">.net</a>
<dd><a href="http://www.stanwoodpiano.com/" eudora="autourl">http://www.stanwoodpiano.com</a>
<dd>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ </blockquote><br>
<br>
</font>
</dl><br>
</html>