<html>
<body>
I've never understood the convenience of the digest. Aren't all the
e-mails posted in there? What's the advantage? I get them spread out. You
get them all at once! Eudora catches "most" of the spam, so I
guess I just don't understand what the advantage is. <br><br>
Avery <br><br>
At 10:39 AM 3/5/2006, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<font face="Arial, Helvetica" size=7>>Anyway, sorry for the
inconvenience.<br>
</font><br>
I like the new format for archival reading.<br><br>
Before, in order to reply to a thread from the archive, I would have to
copy the subject<br>
and click on the address then paste the subject to the new e-mail and
change the address.<br>
Then go back to the archive to copy relevant text supporting my
reply.<br><br>
Now it's as easy as it is was when receiving the posts directly to my 'in
box'.<br>
Now I can copy relevant text for my reply (not send the entire post -
hint, hint)<br>
and generate an email with one click.<br><br>
A fantastic upgrade.<br><br>
<pre>--
</pre><font face="Courier New, Courier"></font><br>
Regards,<br><br>
Jon Page<br><br>
PS As mentioned before, I prefer reading the list via the archive
as it cuts down on<br>
the bulk to my daily mail. The majority of which is spam but now doesn't
require<br>
much scrutinizing plus the option for selective reading. I would
spend 30 to 45 minutes<br>
reading and sorting mail, now it takes 3 to 10 minutes.<br><br>
Andy scores one big ATTA-BOY<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Pianotech list info:
<a href="https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives" eudora="autourl">
https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives</a></blockquote></body>
</html>