<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2912" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=Arial>Absolutely. I have used the Verituner for the past few years and loved it. For me, nothing else will do. Prior to that I used a SAT III and prior to that a SAT I. Truly, the SAT III is a wonder of "Practical, Powerful, Professional", Reliable and Simplistic. IMHO the SAT III is a wonder to piano tuning. Whether one prefers it or one of the other ETDs, is a matter of feature preference. IMHO, the SAT III is for the tech who wants to move fast and has no fear of interjecting his/her own opinion of tuning characteristics on the fly. Truly a work of art. A marvelous tuning aid.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial>Terry Farrell</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"> </DIV><FONT size=3>Pricey? They're now $1300.00. IMO, that compares pretty well to all the others. Especially if <BR>one doesn't already have a laptop! <BR><BR>Avery <BR><BR>At 02:39 PM 7/12/2006, you wrote:<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">SAT III ---> Practical. Powerful. Professional. Pricey.<BR> <BR>I wonder if Monsieur Sanderson will ever come out with a compact model, the Babysat?<BR> <BR>Alan Barnard<BR>Salem, Missouri</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>