<div>Hello,</div> <div> </div> <div>I used TuneLab 97 prior to upgrading to Pro and now Pocket.  I also previously used a SAT II.  You can learn to use TuneLab 97, though it is a little more work if you use the graphic or numeric tuning curve editor.  Alternately, you can download David Porritt's Calcul8 plugin and it will automatically calculate a tuning curve for you, using 3-5 IH measurements.  The plugin is on the TuneLab web site. </div> <div> </div> <div>I did learn to use the graphic editor and produced some very nice tuning curves that I could aurally verify (I also tune aurally).  If you are interested, I will gladly post my procedure for using the TuneLab 97 graphic editor.  It is very helpful to have an understanding of aural tuning principles when using TuneLab 97 or any ETD for that matter. </div> <div> </div> <div>Yes, I do recommend the Pro/Pocket versions, but TuneLab 97 is a better tuning program than it gets credit for.  It is guilty of requiring you to think.  The enhancements that come with the Pro and Pocket versions are well worth the modest investment.  </div> <div> </div> <div>Best regards,</div> <div>Brent Musgrave<br><br> </div> <div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/12/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Samuel Choy</b> <<a href="mailto:sam@scpianoservice.com">sam@scpianoservice.com</a>> wrote:</span> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Hello List,<br><br>There's been a lot of talk about TuneLab. I looked on the web and found<br>TunelLab 97 and TuneLab Pro. It looks like that TuneLab Pro the upgraded <br>version of TuneLab 97. My question is, has any one used TuneLab 97? Is Tune<br>Lab Pro worth spending the extra money?<br><br>Thanks<br><br>Samuel Choy<br><br></blockquote></div><br>