<HTML><HEAD> <META charset=US-ASCII http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff"> <DIV> <DIV>Wait a minute,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>      I thought an Associate could use the PTG logo if they used the one that reads <EM><STRONG>associate member</STRONG></EM> underneath. At least thats the way they are showing up on the PTG website.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Julia Gottshall</DIV> <DIV>Reading. PA</DIV> <DIV>In a message dated 9/3/2006 6:50:11 AM Eastern Standard Time, ricbrek@broadpark.no writes:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT face=Arial>No... "Tuners" are pretty well defined.  You got your RPT's,  and they <BR>have the PTG's permision to use the PTG logo... which is the PTG's right <BR>to decide since the PTG owns the logo. And you got those who have not <BR>for whatever reaons obtained RPT status who are associate members.  They <BR>do not get to use the PTG logo.. which is also the PTG's right do decide <BR>since the PTG owns the logo.  In both cases, Associate and RPT, the <BR>designations were pretty clearly defined and rather dispassionatly at that.</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV> <DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>