<html>
I am forwarding the report below on behalf of Mark Cramer as he is not
subscribed to Pianotech. He has also posted this report on CAUT<br><br>
Terry Beckingham<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:40:52
-0600<br>
From: Mark Cramer <Cramer@BrandonU.ca><br>
To: CAUT <caut@ptg.org><br>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)<br>
Importance: Normal<br>
Subject: [CAUT] Wapin Seminar Report<br>
X-BeenThere: caut@ptg.org<br>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7<br>
Reply-To: College and University Technicians <caut@ptg.org><br>
Sender: caut-bounces@ptg.org<br>
X-Xplornet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information<br>
X-Xplornet-MailScanner: Found to be clean<br>
X-Xplornet-MailScanner-From: caut-bounces@ptg.org<br>
X-Spam-Status: No<br>
X-NAS-BWL: Found match for 'Cramer@BrandonU.ca' on the allowed list (219
addresses, 0 domains)<br>
X-NAS-Classification: 0<br>
X-NAS-MessageID: 19422<br>
X-NAS-Validation: {B604C2D8-0B98-49C9-B7B3-4AF989CF8907}<br><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Hello all,</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>here are some photos from the recent Wapin
installation seminar at Brandon University.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>You may recall my skepticism about Wapin. After
reading the amazing claims on the Wapin website, I e-mailed Tim Geinert
and asked "are you willing to prove it!?"</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Even when he generously offered to travel here
and answer my challenge, the doubts remained... "is the piano going
to sound wierd, will we need scientific equipment to tell, or are we all
just going to agree to "imagine" what we hear.(!?)"
</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Fortunately the results were NOT subtle. The
improvement I personally witnessed in this piano was profound, more to
the order of a <i>transformation</i>. </font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Every pianist, even those who had been quite
vocal about their dislike for this "plinky" instrument noticed
it right away, without prompting... "it lingers, what did you do to
open the sound?..." Some were arrested within a few bars, and one at
the very first chord! </font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>And as musicians do, they all seemed to
conveniently forget about the bad regulation, wobbly keys and uneven
voicing they had pointed out beforehand, and zero in on something else,
in fact the only "something else " that had actually
changed. By their own words, this "ugly" instrument
went from "unplayable" to "vibrant," and from
"completely un-interesting" to "wonderful," albeit
within 24 hours! </font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>For us technicians however, trying to desribe
any improvement using the tired old adjectives "warmer, richer,
stronger, faster, etc." gets real lame in a hurry. So I'll put it
this way; when I install new hammers, or deep-needle the shoulders, or
carefully fit them to the strings, I have a certain aural expectation in
mind. Sometimes I'm pleased, sometimes disappointed.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>By comparison, the effect Wapin displayed on
this instument would be <i>greater</i> than my expectation of any of the
three routines described above, and at least <i>equal</i> to the
combination of all three put together, in their perceived ability to
enhance a piano's sound. I hope this paints a helpful
picture.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>My humble recommendation...</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>If you're the type who prefers to wallow in the
mild bemusement of actually doing something, over the heady exhilaration
of sublime speculation and endless debate, find a profoundly
disappointing instrument (preferably the work of thine own hands) and try
this Wapin thing out for yourself. Make your own
conclusions.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Retro-fitting is less work than a typical
bridge-repinning, and I think they even have a "how to" DVD.
I'm sure the results will make this little adventure more than worth your
while. </font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>As for the skeptic, well I've just ordered a
Wapin license ($325.00 U.S.) for the 1923 Mason & Hamlin A I'm
currently rebuilding and intend to for the 1885 Steinway A, and possibly
the 1912 B ... (I might occasionaly be cheap, but I ain't stupid.
;>) <br>
</font> <br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Finally, I have to express an overwhelming debt
of gratitude to Tim Geinert. Not just for the generousity of his time,
and so capably sharing a valuable skill, but for taking a disappointing
piano within my care, and transforming it to a musical level I had
otherwise been unable to achieve.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Thanks Tim!</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>best regards,</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Mark Cramer,</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Brandon University</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>PS One strange thing; you can actually
"feel the resonance" through the keys. All the pianists noticed
this. It's not in the least bit distracting, actually we tend to think
it's kind of cool!</font><br>
<br>
<br><br>
<br>
</blockquote></html>