<html>
<body>
<font size=3>No, it's not! Just wait until you can't get parts for it any
more! <br><br>
Avery <br><br>
At 08:13 PM 1/12/2007, you wrote:<br>
</font><blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<font face="Arial, Helvetica" size=2>There is a technical discussion and
then the discussion that matters alot to the technicians. A lot of
the professional players, teachers, schools, churches and recording
studios have already decided on digital. These changes will mean
far more to the profession than whether or not there are technical
differences between the two instruments. It's small, I can move it,
I don't have to tune it, it makes all kinds of sounds, I can use it with
my computer, it costs less. My point I think is that a professional
rebuilders criteria of piano sound is not very relevant to the average
piano consumer. I heard a Yamaha radio ad for the clavinova, same
action, same sound as the best grand. $100,000, or $2000, it's all
the same.<br>
Phil Mosley</font></blockquote></body>
</html>