<HTML style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: MS Sans Serif"><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1251"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.11" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <P> <DIV>Ric said: "<FONT size=+0>I think I'm going to end up with about a 4 mm length increase in the </FONT> <DIV><FONT size=+0>highest notes. Even with puresound its hard to get anything that looks </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=+0>even remotely reasonable with a shorter length on my spreadsheet. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=+0>Inharmonicity is way off the chart as is... and its really uneven."</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3>Ric,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3>Try not to get too hung up on the "inharmonicity"! IMO, that's where a lot of "scalers" go wrong. (Flack Suit tightly zipped!<G>) The fact that you are using Pure Sound complicates the issues, IMO. Because, it will provide a lower tension is opposite of what I would want in the upper treble. I seem to recall that this is a Bechstein. If that is the case, you have ZERO wiggle room between the hammers and the belly rail, even at the olde scale perameters. Caution should be the key, here.<G></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3>Regards,</FONT></DIV></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Joe Garrett, R.P.T.</DIV> <DIV>Captain of the Tool Police</DIV> <DIV>Squares R I</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <P></P></BODY></HTML>