<html>
<body>
<font size=3>At 03:25 PM 3/13/2007, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Yes,... I realize this.... thats
why I mentioned the bit about Texas you see.... everything is big in
Texas.... you go rabbit hunting with elephant guns there I
understand..... I figured a 150 mm would do for dear hunting down
there.... never mind... I just have this weird sense of humour
:)</font></blockquote><br>
Ah...the old Texas problem.<br><br>
We really should just cut Alaska in two, and then Texas could be the
third-biggest state. (Sorry, Avery!)<br><br>
Best.<br><br>
Horace<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font size=3>Cheers<br>
RicB<br><br>
<br>
Hi, Ric,<br><br>
At 11:37 AM 3/13/2007, you wrote:<br>
>Hi Horace<br>
><br>
>And here I was thinking that the 150 stood for
milimeters... hehe.<br><br>
Well...if we're talking about field or<br>
tank-mounted guns, that would be right. In this<br>
case, we are talking about the measurement of the mass of
the bullet<br>
in grains.<br><br>
Best.<br><br>
Horace<br>
</font></blockquote></body>
</html>