<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=226125906-19032007><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>The
fact that he did not get defensive tells me that he is open to learning more. He
is probably, for lack of alternative resources, simply sharing what he has
been taught by people that he respects and has no reason to question. Sometimes
that may even be the manufacturers literature. It's how most without resources
like the pianotech listserver, and PTG, get their "facts". The
fact that I am a tech and he is not earns my opinion some respect in his eyes.
But since I don't know either, (which is why I'm here), and since we both want
to learn more, where would you suggest he and I go to learn more about the
facts of hammer construction? Is there a web site that has this kind of
information?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=226125906-19032007><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=226125906-19032007><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>--
Geoff Sykes</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=226125906-19032007><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>--
Assoc. Los Angeles<BR></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] <B>On Behalf Of
</B>Jurgen Goering<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, March 18, 2007 11:47
PM<BR><B>To:</B> pianotech@ptg.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: A question about
hammer construction<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>It sounds like the salesman showing
his ignorance to his clients, but of course they couldn't tell. Just about
everything he says is pretty much wrong. Hammers without underfelt are not
necessarily softer, cheaper, lower quality, shorter lasting, and they are by
no means indicative of the quality of the instrument. Today, most
bottom-of-the-barrel pianos have hammers <B>with</B> underfelt.
<BR><BR>Although hammers without underfelt are not found in many pianos made
today , in the past there were many fantastic instruments that had single
layer felt hammers. I am thinking about older Bechsteins, Blüthners, etc.
<BR>The presence of an underfelt and its characteristics flow into hammer
performance just as the size, shape, and wood species used in the molding
do.<BR><BR>Hammer felt making is a world unto itself, and the processes of
manufacturing that felt into hammers are precise, complex and varied. I think
everyone would be better served if piano sales people like the one in question
were more knowledgeable about the instruments they are selling. Simplifying
things for the average client is fine, but one has to at least start and end
up with facts. It doesn't sound like one could learn much about pianos (or
hammers at least) by talking to this salesman.<BR><BR><BR><?smaller>Jurgen
Goering<BR>Piano Forte Supply<BR>(250)
754-2440<BR>info@pianofortesupply.com<BR>http://www.pianofortesupply.com<BR><BR><?/smaller><BR>On
Mar 16, 2007, at 22:02, Geoff Sykes wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>This
afternoon, after store hours, I asked a salesman at the store I work at
one day a week about the way he describes hammer construction and
performance to his customers. Basically he is telling customers that the
colored section next to the wood is a second layer that makes the hammer
harder, (or whatever), and that the multiple layered hammers perform
better, last longer and are subsequently more expensive
and therefore only found on pianos that cost a little more. Single
layer hammers, (solid white), on the other hand, are softer, don't
perform as well and wear out quicker.<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>I
shared with him that I seem to remember "learning" somewhere that the
colored section was, functionally, simply that. A colored section. That
the coloring of that section was used to identify hammers made to certain
specifications and/or for certain buyers. Also, that hammers with that
colored layer were only found in pianos whose manufacturers went
to the trouble to actually define those characteristics to the hammer
manufacturer.<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>The
fact that the colored layer hammers are only found in the slightly more
expensive better made pianos is a given. As is the fact that the
colored layer also usually indicates a higher quality hammer. My
conversation with this salesman was not an argument. I was just curious and
was hoping to learn something. But at the end of our conversation we both
had the same questions:<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>:
Is that colored section actually a second layer? (We could not tell by
feeling it.)<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>:
Is that colored section, or second layer, actually functionally different
than the rest of the
hammer?<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>:
In other words, does it actually do more than merely act as an identifier
for the characteristics of that hammer?<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>The
way he describes hammers to the customer probably doesn't
require change. Simplifying things for the average customer is not
necessarily a bad thing. We just want to know for ourselves.<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>