<html>
<body>
<font size=3>I figured I'd get a "rise" out of you! Thanks for
not disappointing me! :-D<br><br>
Avery <br><br>
At 03:43 PM 3/31/2007, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">And the answer is... that
Steinway likes their own sound and their own transition... and a lot of
other people do too. Yamaha gave up trying to get the Steinway
sound a while back because they decided they actually were quite happy
with the way their CF III and S series were developing. Plus the fact
that there is considerable social/business inertia that impedes any major
change in such an organization. I do not buy Davids or Dales claim
that it makes a qualitative /improvement/ because that is purely a matter
of subjective taste... period. It makes a qualitative /change/ that
some may like and some will not. And if enough do like it.. then it
will make an impact that will cause a change in the industry. If not...
well then it wont. Dispassionate as hell... but the bloody truth of
the matter.<br><br>
Cheers<br>
RicB<br><br>
<br>
David/Dale,<br><br>
My question is if it makes that much improvement,<br>
why doesn't Steinway? I know the answer. I just<br>
want to see what you two say! :-D<br><br>
Avery</font></blockquote></body>
</html>