<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial" bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2> <DIV> <DIV> <STRONG><EM> Ric</EM></STRONG></DIV> <DIV><STRONG><EM>  Even if all my clients do like it & alll David's clients it will not change corporate manufacturing one iota & I don't care if it does, because then we wouldn't be offering anything different, new or exciting.  You Know?</EM></STRONG></DIV> <DIV><STRONG><EM> But somewhere subjective becomes more better than something else otherwise we wouldn't tune or voice or breathe cause it would be .......well subjective.</EM></STRONG></DIV> <DIV><STRONG><EM> BTW , I respect dispassionate.</EM></STRONG></DIV> <DIV><STRONG><EM> Dale</EM></STRONG></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>I do not <BR>buy Davids or Dales claim that it makes a qualitative /improvement/ <BR>because that is purely a matter of subjective taste... period.  It makes <BR>a qualitative /change/ that some may like and some will not.  And if <BR>enough do like it.. then it will make an impact that will cause a change <BR>in the industry. If not... well then it wont.  Dispassionate as hell... <BR>but the bloody truth of the matter.<BR><BR>Cheers<BR>RicB<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV> </DIV></FONT><BR><BR><BR><DIV><FONT style="color: black; font: normal 10pt ARIAL, SAN-SERIF;"><HR style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px">See what's free at <A title="http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503" href="http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503" target="_blank">AOL.com</A>. </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>