<div>I've helped rebuild a Bush & Lane upright years ago. They CAN be a great sounding instrument! </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Avery <br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/11/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">J Patrick Draine</b> <<a href="mailto:jpdraine@gmail.com">jpdraine@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">I would not put much credence in the descriptions you'll find in the<br>"Bluebook of Pianos." The first quoted passage is probably from some
<br>ad copy put out by B&L back in the day.<br>That said, I don't have any bad words to say about Bush & Lane. Those<br>that I have serviced were quite old and worn out, and the owners had<br>no intention to rebuild ("just tune please, fix the sticky keys").
<br>Good luck,<br>Patrick<br><br>On 6/11/07, <a href="mailto:stuka@mindspring.com">stuka@mindspring.com</a> <<a href="mailto:stuka@mindspring.com">stuka@mindspring.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Hi all,<br>><br>> I'm seeing good things on the internet about about Bush and Lane instruments, such as "The Bush & Lane grand is unique for the volume and purity of its tone and tile durable character of its construction. It is doubtful whether the sympathetic tone possessed by the smallest of the Bush & Lane Grands has been surpassed in any other grand of its size. The wonderful power and charming sweetness of tone of the entire line of Bush & Lane grands has been enthusiastically acclaimed by all musicians who have played them." from the Bluebook of Pianos, and on sellers claim that "Most piano technicians perk up when you mention the name "Bush & Lane"! Considered equal or superior to Steinway pianos from the same period, this company has been somewhat forgotten except by those "in the know"". I'm going to look at a 6' Bush and Lane shortly, is this sales pitch I cited in the ballpark, or just hype?
<br>><br>> Thanks,<br>><br>> Matt<br>><br>><br></blockquote></div><br>