<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3132" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Hi Danilo,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><BR> </DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks, Tony, I enjoyed this mail!</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>No." I was quite baffled. I even tried to convince
him that something must be improvable by playing a bit and asking "Is
this or that really supposed to be like this, ideally? -Yes, it's fine." Then
he added "Just avoid the sun, it makes it go out of tune faster." </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>This is what I was reffering
to. You will find that on this list the majority of participants do not fall
in this catigory</FONT>.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Well, it gave me another reason to teach myself. On
the opposite end, I gave a recital in a church on a 70's Steinway B,
which the organist had hired someone to renovate for ca $15000. The members of
his constitution were forever complaining "Did you really have to spend so
much money?" He asked me to help him out by taking every opportunity to praise
the instrument. Which I dutifully did. "The best piano I've ever played on,
it's as good as a brand new one, and they cost bla bla, it's amazing what
value you can get from such a perfect restoration!" It was easy, as I was
speaking the truth...</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>About the position of the jack, you
wrote<BR>"..the repetition regulating screw at the hammer end of the
repetition lever requires adjusting to allow the top of the jack to be just
below the top of the repetition lever."</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Lift the hammer up of the action and
have a look at the movement of the top of the jack in relation to the
repetition lever. Run a small straight edge ( end of a small ruler) over the
repetition lever and it should NOT touch the jack when the key is just
released. Upon releasing the finger from the key slowly you will notice the
jack top falls just below the top of the rep. spring and in practice under the
knuckle. If it does not then there are two solutions. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>1. adjust the repetition screw so
that the lever is high enough to allow free movement of the jack.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>2. Because you have increased the
tension on the rep. spring the rep. lever may now be higher and you need to
reajust the drop screw to correct the height that the rep. lever will
go.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><BR>I thought it was suppposed to be just above the
top of the repetition lever? And I've adjusted it that way. Please be so
kind as to confirm this! Or do you mean the position of the jack at the
moment the hammer is released from check and lifted up by the repetion
lever?</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>"Your drop screw may be too low stopping the
repetition lever going up high enough"<BR>I've set it to make the drop about a
mm or so, relying on my eyesight.<BR>You've given me some new things to look
out for, so next time I get to the instrument, I'll check everything
carefully: I'll try to add some weight to the hammer shank (someone wrote
somewhere about wrapping a bit of solderingmetal around the shank?) and
carefully observe the relative positions of the jack/repetitionlever from rest
to full depression of the key and back. Anything else I should think
of?</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Have fun it's exciting learning</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Tony</FONT></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>