<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>RE: The Acme A1 Temperament</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" />
<style type="text/css">
<!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
-->
</style>
</head>
<body>
<blockquote cite="" type="cite">
<p align="left">So how come the pretty much whole world has settled on ET as the tuning goal of choice?</p>
<p align="left">Not challenging anyone's opinion or ability here (I've never even heard a Coleman 11 or EBVT tuning), it's just a response to the comment that they would be better sounding than ET. Is that a key-specific observation?<br /><br />Alan Barnard<br />Salem, MO<br /><br /></p>
<div style="padding-right: 5px; padding-left: 5px; padding-bottom: 5px; border-left: #000000 3px solid; padding-top: 5px">
<hr />Original message<br />From: "Jon Page"
<jonpage@comcast.net> </jonpage@comcast.net><br />To: pianotech@ptg.org<br />Received: 6/30/2007 8:30:46 AM<br />Subject: The Acme A1 Temperament<br /><br />
<blockquote cite="" type="cite">
<p align="left">"<font face="Arial" color="#000000"><i>And this the proof why this tempermant is superior to any other."</i> BS</font></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote cite="" type="cite"><font face="Arial" color="#000000">"WHOA! How can you possibly say that? I have heard many great tunings," DA</font></blockquote>
<div><br />Put it up against a mild WT such as Coleman 11 or EBVT and I bet</div>
<div>it would take a back seat as ET usually does.</div>
<x-sigsep> </x-sigsep>
<pre>--
</pre>
<div><br />Regards,<br /><br />Jon Page</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>