<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16481" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; webkit-nbsp-mode: space; webkit-line-break: after-white-space" bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I used WD-40 in the early 70's.  It was one of the best penetrating oils available.  I believe the EPA required the type of solvent used to spread the lubricant to be changed and it is now as gummy as 3 in 1.  I find that it is the locksmith's friend as it in my opinion, it gums up locks to the point that they are not useable.  I find that the gunk can be removed with Brake Clean from the auto parts store. I suggest you have a lot of ventilation when using Brake Clean.  </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bill Peterson</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=tompiano@bellsouth.net href="mailto:tompiano@bellsouth.net">Tom Servinsky</A> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=pianotech@ptg.org href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">Pianotech List</A> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, August 20, 2007 3:08 AM</DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Steinway B WD-40 update</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>List,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>To refresh your memory, I was dealing with a Steinway B which was sprayed with WD-40 by the owner. The visible signs of the WD-40 were mainly in the belly area, as one could write his/her name through the gooh build-up. A little was in the tuning pin area.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Initially the sustain had always been pretty good, but after the spray, the sustain diminished to about 4 seconds in the mid tenor. The bass was no better. My initial prediction  was that the WD-40 ruined the soundboard and we would have had to start over. Keep in mind that there was excellent bearing and crown throughout.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>So here's what I discovered:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Before teardown I had experimented with replacing a few strings throughout the piano to see if the strings were the culprit. Some improvement in tonal clarity and sustain, but not enough to be convinced that was the smoking gun.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thoroughly cleaned the termination points ( capo/ agraffe and bridge pins/ cap)- on the same strings. Some improvement but not that much.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Replaced bridge pins to the next size with the same length on the same notes. Some tonal improve somewhat.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>My gut feeling was thinking that the build up of gooh on the soundboard  had to be the reason for the sustain issue.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>After teardown:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Did my usual "thump" test on the board to check for sustain.  Surprisingly pretty nice, full sustainable sound. The board definitely was still very excitable.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Checked the bridges to see if WD 40 had ruined the bridge cap. Some of the list's suggestions were aimed at dealing with the quality of the termination points. Overall, the bridge cap was pretty decent, however I did have some softer wood in the very top section.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Checked the bridge pins- VIOLA! Here was the smoking gun. The bridge pins were so loose that I could take them out by hand. Additionally the depth for the hole was much deeper than the pin length. Replaced the pins up to a #8 x 1" in the treble bridge and to a #9 x1" in the bass bridge. Epoxy was added to the very high treble for additional pin support.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The soundboard was thoroughly cleaned with mineral spirits, then stripped, then refinished. </FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2>The piano has been restrung and sustain is back to where it once was. Sustain the tenor is now 18 seconds. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>What I discovered: </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Good solid termination must exist at the bridge pin/string intersection. Pins must very secure and bottomed out for maximum termination. Note that when I had replaced the pins on my initial experiments, I didn't use an appropriate length for the bridge pin. Although it was tight, it was not deep enough for maximum effect.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Adding a lubricant to the bridge pin area can potentially destroy any chance for capturing energy from the string.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bridge caps are generally free of any finish,  thus the bridge is particularly more vulnerable to lubricants like WD-40 soaking into the wood.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>WD-40, unlike many other lubricants that we use, has a goohy build up factor. Avoid this product at all cost.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It is understandable why adding this type of lubricant is more suitable for home related squeaks and groans than acoustical instruments.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Tom Servinsky</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>