<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16525" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial" bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2> <DIV> <DIV>  Really? WOW Dave, I'll let Trix give an earful about this sometime. Dont' get her started!!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>   We've found the opposite. The Denro pins are undersized of a true advertised sizes of .282.--.286 etc.  Usually 1 to 3 thous. under. ie..the denros listed as 286s are usually predominantly .284 with some fatter & thinner. </DIV> <DIV>  We have often mic,d entire sets & put the smaller pins in the treble & thicker in bass. Diamond seems to run closer to  the correct no.s but still with variance.  This is only more critical I think when repinning an exsiting block.</DIV> <DIV>  Oh yes.  As to the mystery ..It's wood.  grin.</DIV> <DIV>  We just got a few sets of the Beine pins from Jurgen.  Jury's still out.  Nice looking though.</DIV> <DIV>  Dale</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>I've actually found the Denro pins to be more uniform than the Diamond pins.<BR>My guess about the mystery is that it has something to with variation in<BR>depth that the pins are driven.  <BR><BR>David Love<BR>davidlovepianos@comcast.net <BR>www.davidlovepianos.com</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV> </DIV></FONT><BR><BR><BR><DIV><FONT style="color: black; font: normal 10pt ARIAL, SAN-SERIF;"><HR style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px">Get a sneak peek of the all-new <A title="http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000982" href="http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000982" target="_blank">AOL.com</A>.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>