<html>  <head></head> <body>  <DIV></DIV>Thanks Ron, will do.<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message from Ronny Boyd <ronnybyd@yahoo.com>: -------------- <BR><BR> <STYLE type=text/css></STYLE> <DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"> <DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"><STRONG>Hi Rick,  I had a Gulbranson that had the Woods and Brooks 90 degree inverted direct blow that I fixed up to give to my grand daughter . They are pretty rare around here. I really liked it and still don't understand why they didn't pursue that action. If you ever need the specs for regulating it let me know as they are different from a regular action.</STRONG></DIV> <P><STRONG></STRONG> </P> <P><STRONG>Ron Boyd - Milwaukee chapter #532</STRONG></P> <DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"><BR></DIV> <DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">----- Original Message ----<BR>From: "richard.ucci@att.net" <richard.ucci@att.net><BR>To: pianotech@ptg.org<BR>Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 2:09:02 PM<BR>Subject: cable action<BR><BR> <DIV>List,</DIV> <DIV>Tuned a Cable console today,ca: 1948, with an inverted type action? Jacks were horizontal and backchecks caught the hammer from above . Seemed like a better design than modern spinets . No rods, and action can be removed easily.</DIV> <DIV>Any thoughts? </DIV> <DIV>Rick Ucci/Ucci Piano</DIV></DIV> <DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"><BR></DIV></DIV><BR> <HR SIZE=1> Shape Yahoo! in your own image. <A href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48517/*http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7">Join our Network Research Panel today!</A> </BLOCKQUOTE>  </body> </html>