<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3157" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Hi Gene,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>You can also control the string angles across the
bridge be varying the distance between the bridge pin rows.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><EM>"Does anyone put new bridge pins exactly on the
location mark without an offset - depending only on the pin diameter, pin angle,
front to rear pin spacing and wire diameter for the string
angle/offset across the bridge?"</EM></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Yes.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Setting new bridge pin location arrays also will allow you
to even-out string spacing. Going to vertical hitches are a plus in that
process.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>But original bridge? Not rescaling to allow new speaking
lengths?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><IMG alt="" hspace=0
src="cid:028701c7fe46$dcdd1270$0201a8c0@DESKTOP" align=baseline
border=0></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Terry Farrell</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thinking about bridge pin lay out here and have
questions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Have a new board with recapped bridges made of
laminated maple - planed to bearing hight and ready for new bridge pins to be
located.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It is very tempting to use the old bridge cap for
the new pin layout but will not take this approach.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I have been in shop and class where I was shown
how to use clear Plexiglas templates to offset the pin from the pin
location/string line to get consistent string angles across the bridges.
Researched the archives to get some numbers and a formula to make this
work. (Thank you Ron Nossman) I must now put this information into my new
bridge.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I have also read in Wolfenden's book and could
find no reference to offsetting the pin from the string line/position in any
way that was used in his designs. If this was not done on pianos of his era
you would think that the changing string angles would be noticeable on
different parts of the bridges? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Does everyone use some sort of offsetting formula
for locating new bridge pins? Does anyone put new bridge pins exactly on the
location mark without an offset - depending only on the pin diameter, pin
angle, front to rear pin spacing and wire diameter for the string
angle/offset across the bridge?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Wolfenden also mentions the need to slightly
widen the longer strings at the bridge pins so that the longer
strings do not touch when vibrating. Is this just a spacing issue and
widening is whatever you can get away with or is there some way to figure how
to do this? I had always thought that the hitch pin diameter determined
the bridge pin spacing but not necessarily in the bass? Widening would
seem to alter a calculated offset?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks for any of your thoughts.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Gene Nelson</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>