<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/5/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Tom Servinsky</b> <<a href="mailto:tompiano@bellsouth.net">tompiano@bellsouth.net</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Sorry John, I guess I totally miss-understood your point. Sorry!<br>As far as the foam on the top, that does quiet things down quite a bit. So
<br>much so, the player feels like the piano is sounding from another room.<br>Here's my take on things:<br>The one's doing the most complaining are the ones who are doing the<br>listening, not ones doing the playing. It's the overall volume taking over
<br>the household that bothers most listeners. Thus the foam on the bottom of<br>the piano really retards the sound coming from that section of the piano. In<br>our part of the world, we have a lot of extremely hard floors with no rugs
<br>or carpets under the piano ( marble and stone). The sounds bounces very<br>quickly off of the bottom and shoots around the rooms in droves. Adding the<br>foam will slow that problem down to a crawl. What's interesting is that the
<br>player can barely notice any difference in sound.<br>Adding the foam on the top adds another effect as it's diminishes the sound<br>to the player. If the piano is being strictly as a player piano, the foam on<br>
top will help tremendously. However, if the piano is going to be played by a<br>pianist they will be shocked with the diminished sound. If the piano is<br>being used strictly by a pianist, I will opt not to add foam to the top.
<br>There's a psychologically phenomenon that occurs when the piano is being<br>played by a person, as the piano is expected to be heard.<br>When the piano is being played by a player mechanism, people have a tendency
<br>to think the volume of the piano should behave like a stereo receiver. You<br>should be able to go to a complete, distant, ambient sound of Volume 1. Of<br>course, that's an impossibility when dealing with the complexities of a
<br>piano. But that's what I have been able to derive from the comments about<br>volume and pianos.<br>It comes down to what your end games needs to be.<br>Tom Servinsky<br>----- Original Message -----<br>From: "John Formsma" <
<a href="mailto:formsma@gmail.com">formsma@gmail.com</a>><br>To: "Pianotech List" <<a href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</a>><br>Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 8:09 PM<br>Subject: Re: Acoustic foam
<br><br><br>> On 11/4/07, Tom Servinsky <<a href="mailto:tompiano@bellsouth.net">tompiano@bellsouth.net</a>> wrote:<br>><br>>> There is a big difference between foam mattress material and acoustical<br>>> baffle foam. Recording studios having been using this material for years
<br>>> to<br>>> insulate the interior space against outside noise. Can't say I have ever<br>>> seen a recording studio pad the walls with mattress foam. I'm not sure<br>>> how<br>>> the acoustical/physical characteristics plays into the egg crate shape,
<br>>> but<br>>> it does contain sound extremely well.<br>>> That being said, any material (be it foam, blankets, or anything) is<br>>> going<br>>> to aid in retarding sound from the bottom of the piano. The question is
<br>>> how<br>>> much containment of sound are you hoping for. We've experimented with<br>>> just<br>>> about everything and for the extra money, the high grade acoustical<br>>> baffle<br>
>> foam is well worth the extra cost.<br>><br>> I agree with you, Tom. I was responding to what Israel said about<br>> using a foam mattress cut to size. That will reduce the sound, but as<br>> I said, the acoustic foam is denser and would do a better job.
<br>><br>> What I was talking about was after the acoustic foam was in place on<br>> top and bottom. I was wondering if a foam mattress might help *in<br>> addition* to what was already there. It did make a difference, but not
<br>> significant enough. Sorry if I worded it poorly.<br>><br>> Having done my little experiment on that job, I will use acoustic foam<br>> in the future if ever I need to reduce the volume.<br>><br>> Someone else before me had put a sheet of fiberglass insulation in
<br>> there. That doesn't work well at all, just in case anyone was<br>> wondering. <g><br>><br>> JF<br>><br>Years ago I had a very fussy customer with one of those tiny 4' 5or6" George Steck grands. He felt it was too loud for the room, it was a huge room with carpet, heavy brocade drapes, bookcases, plenty of "soft stuff" to absorb sound but he wanted it quiter still. I arrived one day to tune and he had had a custom cover made for it, padded with a quilting inside. The outer cover matched the drapery material and fit from where the top folded back all the way over the nose and hung a few inches past the rim. It was very quiet, after I removed it to tune it was still very quiet, I looked underneath and he had stuffed 2 foam bed pillows between the beams and sound board! Perhaps I should have said nearly dead, rather than quiet! <grin>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Mike</div></div><br>-- <br>The way some people find fault, you'd think there was some kind of reward.<br>Michael Magness<br>Magness Piano Service<br>608-786-4404<br><a href="http://www.IFixPianos.com">www.IFixPianos.com
</a><br>email <a href="mailto:mike@ifixpianos.com">mike@ifixpianos.com</a>