<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16587" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=3> <STRONG>Hey Jude</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=3>Hail Dale, (Sorry had to return the rhyme), et
al,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3>I come from the land of a very strict adherence to the
doctrine of CC boards. Speak up if I offend any neighbors here on the
list, but I think I am the only heretic in this part of the land that has
abandoned the CC for a hybrid and even gone as far as experimenting with the
RC & S. </FONT></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> <EM><FONT size=3><STRONG>You heritic</STRONG></FONT></EM></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid">
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2><FONT size=3>Currently, I have settled on a hybrid. I think the
primary reluctance to abandon the lower ranges of MC (3.5-5%) has to do with
the knowledge that most households here range from RH in the low teens in
winter to the high 80s in the summer. We just can't count on our customers
maintaining the RH in their piano room, hell we're lucky enough if we can get
them to move their $80,000 investment away from the fireplace, heating
register, window and exterior wall (like my piano for example, not the price
just the situation).</FONT></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> <STRONG><EM>With the Sitka that you are using your
boards stand a way better chance of surviving than the Much softer varieties of
spruce such as the white boards that Or Eastern spruce. At 5% emc when
ribbing and crowning ribs you have a great sounding piano with less opportunity
for damage.</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM></EM></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid">
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2><FONT size=3>We know our wood can withstand the compression set of the
expanding board better than the contracting board so we ere on that side and
deal with the compression ridges. Udo Steingraber also mentioned that their
drying schedule had more to do with protecting the wood from the driest
environs than promoting crown. Some speak of the ethereal qualities and tonal
color that only a CC board <U>can yield but I'll leave that one alone
:).</U></FONT></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> <STRONG><EM>I've heard many incredible sounding C.C. soundboards of
many ages. The point of course as stated many times is we strive for greater
Reliability and predictability. This is the reason we are
trying new techniques. </EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> <STRONG><EM> The C.C. panel is a very strong structure
when built this way & that stiffness is IMO vital component to producing an
even sounding scale. If too much compression is left out of a C. C design but
the old ribbing pattern is retained the possibility for board resonates are
greater. I.e.Such as a weak not on a c sharp 52 & the next note is
strong. We all hear these anomallies in most pianos. Our goal
as board builders & designers is to eliminate them with our methods &
materials.</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=3></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3>Using my handy-dandy "Crownulator," [see archives] the other
thing I've noticed is that my traditional CC brethren, that rely on low MC and
forced crowning (i.e. in a dish) to promote crown, end up with way more crown
than they thought. Their go-bar decks may measure 60' radius, but by the time
the board is glued in, they usually have about a 35' to 40' radius which
is more than what I've seen in some rebuilders' boards that are pre-crowning
their ribs, unless of course they are using a more ambitious radius in their
rib scale from the get go, as I am. This is all measured in
the unloaded state across the grain. Loaded states are even more
interesting, but I would like to collect more data before making any
statements.</FONT></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><STRONG> Yes more initially but even my own practice I can see a huge
belly before it goes in but as the board conforms to the rim some of that extra
crown disappears. I think the numbers of radii you state are fine. I've
introduced some pretty steep crown with my methods/press/ribs with no
adverse results. How much is too much. I dunno</STRONG></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3> Still, I won't be happy until I can say that
this species of wood with such and such modulus of elasticity, given x
amount of load, with y rib scale and design, and so and so's hammers yield
this type of sound. Yeah, dream on...</FONT></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> <STRONG><EM><FONT size=3>Yeah...Well said Jude. I have other
thoughts about the crowned bridge stuff. Maybe there issomething to it
that we just can't quantify. Yes I know the idea has been thoroughly shot
down on list & we can agree to disagree but I can think of one board I
did that had a real sparkle to it when I did this. Not only that but the
board set right into the piano & the trebles & bass corners didn't
require the requiste stress to get them down on the rim. Yes there is a slight
bending stress that is introduced along the grain but is that a bad
thing..... Is it a positive
thing? Perhaps</FONT></EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT size=3> its' like the little Mason
& Hamlin Crown demonstrator jig where the thin piece of spruce is bent along
the grain & then the sound suddenly come to life.
Aye?</FONT></EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT size=3> Many folks do it this way who have decades
of practice. My Motis operandi has always been try stuff &
listen. Then I get to decide for myself......Ain't it
great?</FONT></EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT size=3> Dale</FONT></EM></STRONG></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=3></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3>Back to work,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3></FONT> </DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT><BR><BR><BR><DIV><FONT style="color: black; font: normal 10pt ARIAL, SAN-SERIF;"><HR style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px">Start the year off right. <A title="http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489" href="http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489" target="_blank">Easy ways to stay in shape</A> in the new year. </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>