<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16587" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2>
<DIV><FONT face="Lucida Grande" color=#000000 size=-4></FONT></DIV><FONT
size=1></FONT><STRONG><EM>Ric</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid">
<DIV><STRONG><EM> Ok Ok...Perhaps it was my can of worm statement
for the month</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM> Well it is just,</EM></STRONG> <U><STRONG><FONT
size=3>my own,,,</FONT></STRONG></U> <STRONG><EM>opinion based on my history
of practice. I do, as you may, know continue with an open mind. I did manage
to get my own Steinway B board out intact & am pondering the what to do
for fun question. But on a routine basis I probably would lose money. Can
somebody else here do this & report back. I don't have time to develop
more new protocols right now.</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM> Dale</EM></STRONG><BR><BR>This is another one of those
in reality totally fascinating areas for <BR>discussion that sadly ends up
nearly always in folks gnashing at each <BR>other. Gets into all kinds
of factors that end up being significant <BR>determinants respective to what
one concludes.... like what ones <BR>perception of musical sound is. It
struck me the other day whilst <BR>reading some of the latest round of
Soundboard posts that it is not the <BR>world of pianists who are worst stuck
in their mold of Steinway <BR>worship.... no no no no no... They at least
appreciate on some level or <BR>another a vast huge ocean of musical
sound....even from the <<piano>> <BR>thingy. But piano
technicians however.... my gawd in wholey <BR>hootville... what we don't
<<know>> absolutely and universally. We <BR>routinely
enforce our own perceptions of what good tone is and isn't on <BR>pianists all
the time. For example.... how many of you reacted <BR>negatively to that
recording of the old Pleyel Stéphane Collin put up a <BR>couple weeks back ?
Perhaps some of you think an old C melody saxophone <BR>sucks and a new Buffet
R-13 B-flat clarinet is ok ? :)<BR><BR>Cheers<BR>RicB<BR><BR><BR>
HI JD<BR> I have
thoroughly heard that parade on the list for quite <BR>
some time. A<BR> position I don't
share for the most part but then there are <BR>
times it's<BR> warranted. My Motto is.... If
it aint't broke don't' fix <BR> it.....if it is
then let's<BR> not procrastinate about
it.<BR> Dale<BR><BR>
<BR><BR> The tradition in Europe is to salvage the soundboard at
all costs. <BR> I think<BR> >that's
based more on tradition and attitude about maintaining the<BR>
integrity<BR> >of the original instrument
than whether the soundboard is actually<BR> >performing
its engineering function in an effective manner or can<BR>
even with<BR> >extensive
repairs...<BR></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT><BR><BR><BR><DIV><FONT style="color: black; font: normal 10pt ARIAL, SAN-SERIF;"><HR style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px">Who's never won? <A title="http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002548" href="http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002548" target="_blank">Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.</A></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>