<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16587" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV> <STRONG> Hey RIc
--Greg</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG> Been out of town & missed a lot of this. RIc you
make a good case here with room for reasonableness.</STRONG></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Hi again
Greg...<BR> Certainly as a CC board an old panel which has been weakened
<BR>due to compression set will be difficult to make work as a CC board.
At <BR>least more difficult then a new panel.</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> <STRONG>You bet</STRONG></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
The degree with which the panel <BR>has compression strength left is the
determinant here. Feasibly one <BR>could de-rib such a panel, dry it out
and use it again in some kind of <BR>compression reliant assembly with
success.</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> <STRONG><EM>But I probably wouldn't advise it or sell it with a
warranty to a client. It would depend on the integrity of the panel & the
desired outcome expected by the client & rebuilder. For some folks the wood
is sacred & for others the wood is a crap shoot & a risk not worth
taking.</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Using it
in an RC & S assembly on the other hand should be quite alright <BR>as Del
stated some years back. I believe there is some truth to what <BR>Thump
posted about old wood... and as a result I would think such an <BR>assembly
would sound a bit different then an assembly using a brand new
<BR>board. But perhaps any difference is marginal after
all.</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> <STRONG><EM> Using a panel such as this would be
only wise if the panel was by in large Rib crowned & supported &
dried to no more than say 6%</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2><BR><BR>I am kind of skeptical to using phrases like "cellular
destruction" <BR>myself... not because there is anything inherently
untruthfully about <BR>the phrase... <U>but because it conveys a sense of the
wood being rendered <BR>totally useless as a soundboard... which clearly is
not the case.</U></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> <STRONG><EM>Some panels which have survived really well perhaps
not but, When doing restorative work Udo was removing the badly damaged &
cellularly destroyed wood & then machining a new joint & then
gluing the panel back together. Kind a like removing dry rot. I'd do the
same protocol if called upon</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM> </EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM> Ric... A split panel caused by compression
ridging due to climate & bearing pressure <U>is what it is</U> because
it has at least in some locations exceeded the elastic limit of the wood.
Now come on Ric. </EM></STRONG></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>I also
believe the whole compression set argumentation is well <BR>overstated. Not
meaning to deny it is a significant factor in the life <BR>of a soundboard ...
but I do find that there are very many old pianos <BR>that have very nice
sound by any standards left in them.</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> <STRONG><EM>No question. But many more do not.</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> <FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2> Pure <BR>statistics leads me away from accepting compression
reliant panels as <BR>having a built in self destruct
mechanism. </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><STRONG><EM>Well
they due when dried to extreme</EM></STRONG><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Treat
them well... give them <BR>a reasonably nice climate... and they will hold up
nicely for a very <BR>long time indeed.</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> <STRONG><EM>No Argument here</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2>I know there are many on piano tech that disagree. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2><STRONG><EM> Yes & at the end of the day it's up to each one to
make there best choice of methods based on what they know works, feel
comfortable with or understand that theie design is pushing the tonal for good
reason & thier clients are good with that.</EM></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2> I also note that the <BR>vast majority of pianos made today rely on
significant degrees of <BR>compression in there soundboards. <U>These companies,
at least many of them <BR>I believe... are well aware of all the issues we
discuss and their <BR>significance.</U></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM> Maybe not but thye make this their choice any way &
the results are as we see in the field. Some good , some great &
some.........</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM> <FONT size=4>I haven't read all these myriad of post but
one essential element is being grossly over looked & that is the Rebuilders
interest in designing a sound board with a varity of tonal envelopes such
a what was heard in Rochester.</FONT> </EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM> Cheers back at Ya</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM> Dale</EM></STRONG></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2><BR><BR>Cheers<BR>RicB</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT><BR><BR><BR><DIV><FONT style="color: black; font: normal 10pt ARIAL, SAN-SERIF;"><HR style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px">Start the year off right. <A title="http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489" href="http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489" target="_blank">Easy ways to stay in shape</A> in the new year. </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>