<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3268" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=Arial>I do the same thing Paul.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial>Terry Farrell</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Journal February and March 2005. And that was the wrong number--closer to 30 hours. And what can't you understand about not costing a newly discovered but necessary procedure into an already signed agreement. <BR><BR>Paul<BR></FONT></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV>-----Original Message-----<BR> <DIV id=AOLMsgPart_2_53d7a65f-41a0-4399-a8f0-ad4e54eea65a> <DIV align=left>can't figure out your example about the agraffes,  </DIV> <DIV align=left> </DIV> <DIV align=left>"<STRONG><FONT face=Arial>For example, we began to work with agraffes differently many years ago which added about 60 hours into our jobs but which did not get costed into the then current contracts. We wanted to do it, we couldn't in conscience not do it knowing the good results we were getting, so we took the hit for a while. "  </FONT></STRONG></DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">if you mean you were experimenting with an agraffe procedure, I can understand not adding it to the bill...sort of/not really...but eating an extra 60 hours?   what the heck were you doing to the agraffes?   making them?...;-]   </FONT></DIV> <DIV><BR>David Ilvedson, RPT</DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>