<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>RE: Bass Bridge
Position-upright</title></head><body>
<div>At 12:31 -0700 11/3/08, Delwin D Fandrich wrote:</div>
<div><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>I love seeing these old things. The old
upright has long been maligned and discounted as not being a
"real" piano. Yet with some decent design work they can, and
do, rival grands with scales of comparable length.</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>Quite so. A few weeks ago I bought an old Kirkman 4'2"
"Vertical Iron Grand" in on eBay in pretty poor shape.
It had an under-damper action but this, I discovered when it arrived,
was a pretty mediocre affair (probably by Langer) probably retrofitted
in the 1930s. Nevertheless it works and once I had brought it up
to pitch it astounded me with its power and quality and clarity of
tone. In spite of the short vertical bass strings, provided they
are not sounded individually, the bass is terrific. I simply
can't stay away from this piano.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Last week I discovered another smaller one on eBay, certainly not
worth restoring but with good ivory and an original Kirkman
French-made under-damper action. This I will restore and fit to
the good one. It will cost me a round trip of 180 miles with the
cattle trailer and the stool will pay for the petrol.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>The soundboard grain runs horizontally and the bars are
vertical. Today I looked at the stringing scale (12 d/c singles,
12 bichords, 5 covered trichords on the bass bridge) and discover that
the tension of the steel strings is a pretty even 165 lbs reducing in
the high treble to about 150 lbs. It has agraffes all the way
through.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>It's very rare for a piano to thrill me as this one does and I
will have to assess the results of each stage in its restoration to be
sure of not losing or masking the qualities it has. Certainly
there will be no need to make any changes to the soundboard or the
scale but the wire and the hammers will need to be watched
carefully.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Although the present 1930s hammers look cheap and nothing
special, they are producing the best sound from the piano.
Whoever fitted them used 1/4" shanks, which are like tree-trunks,
but again the sound is incredible. I took a left-over
hammer-head from a quite heavy set of Abel Wurzen AA hammers and
fitted it in what would be its proper position in the scale (note 68)
on another piano. On this piano the hammer was far too big in
this position and the result is striking : it produces a very pure
sound but of far less power than the original hammer for a given
effort, and even with more effort it will not produce the brilliancy
of the original hammer. I then moved the new head to a position
lower in the piano where it matched in size the original hammers and
hey presto! it is hardly distinguishable from its neighbours, besides
which it has a 7/16" shank. The original hammer it replaced
I moved to the higher position and sure enough I got the same pure
weak sound. So I must be sure to fit hammers that are small like
the originals, and pretty dense also. And the whole question of
hammer weight would make an interesting discussion.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Now there is nothing unorthodox (for 1890) about this piano.
What gives it its fundamental quality is 1. a good soundboard 2. good
string scaling 3. undoubtedly the 45 mm. bridge, 4. The use of
agraffes, which I do really consider superior, and 5. quite likely the
vertical stringing! But what gives it the elusive qualities that
give the player the feeling he's playing a good grand I have yet to
discover. I have four or five vertical strung pianos of
different makes and about the same size that will be useful points of
comparison when they are all up and running.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>JD</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><img src="cid:p06240802c3fcabbc740c@[10.0.0.1].1.0"></div>
<div><img src="cid:p06240802c3fcabbc740c@[10.0.0.1].1.1"></div>
<div><br></div>
</body>
</html>