Dan,<div>You can see from other replies that a more detailed description of the piano and its deficits, will result in more meaningful answers.</div><div>Patrick Draine<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:39 AM, daniel carlton <<a href="mailto:hacicspe@gmail.com">hacicspe@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div>hi all</div> <div> </div> <div>i looked for about thirty minutes in the archives for info on this topic, but i didn't find an answer and i didn't want to wade through 336 more results from google...</div> <div>i'm drawing up an estimate for someone and i need to know how many tunings to include.</div> <div>so i'm looking in the "G" piano works labor guide for installing an entire set of oversized pins, and it says it includes one tuning. now i guess i can understand only needing a tuning and maybe a pitch adjust if you replace and pull up-to-pitch one pin at a time as you go. but it seems that one-atta-time is slower than all-at-once gang style. </div> <div>if you replaced all the pins gang style, you'd need to chip and tune a few times right?</div> <div>i think the question i need answered most is if i do it one at a time, which i can do pretty quickly, is the tuning going to end up pretty close to pitch when I'm done?</div> <div> </div> <div>thanks all</div> <div> </div><font color="#888888"> <div>daniel carlton</div> </font></blockquote></div><br></div>