<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Original pin block</title></head><body>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font face="Arial" color="#000000">I was
referring to your suggestion (and Jon Page's) about increasing
length of the pin to 2 1/2". The original Steinway pins
I'm extracting are 2 3/8". The "typo" in the
original text is probably an HTML conversion problem. I still
believe you should stay with the original length when increasing the
diameter for the reasons stated. People can, however, do
whatever they want.</font></blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>I install a 2 1/2" pin on single string notes , as I said
and 2 3/8" on the rest. Reason being the tension and width of the
coil. The larger diameter single string core wire can leave a lesser
amount of pin in the block if you keep the bottom of the coil off the
plate consistent with the treble.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>In general, the single strings' pins become loose before the
other pins (YMMV), so this extra length gives them the edge they need.
I do this on new blocks too.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Mic'ing the pins helps for even torque too, with the narrower
diameters in the treble.</div>
<div>There can be four or five different sizes of pins within a set;
that's .001" or .002" either</div>
<div>side of the spec diameter. I discard the out-of-round ones.</div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div><br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Jon Page</div>
</body>
</html>