<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<STYLE>.hmmessage P {
        PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px
}
BODY.hmmessage {
        FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16674" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY class=hmmessage bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Ron & Michael,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>If I understand Ron's question/point here and what you
guys are talking about, it is why duplicate the original pinblock to stretcher
glue joint interface when it creates an angle. Unless I'm missing something the
only two options I can think of would be to leave a little of the old block
intact or to remove some of the stretcher back re-cutting it to a 90 degree
orientation to the pinblock shelf. What's the advantage, time?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Fenton</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=m_spreeman@hotmail.com href="mailto:m_spreeman@hotmail.com">Michael
Spreeman</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">Pianotech List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, August 04, 2008 8:01
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: Doweled and Fully Fit
Pinblocks</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>> Why would you care what the original joint angle might
have <BR>> been from the front of the stretcher?<BR> <BR>I
wouldn't.<BR> <BR>>Isn't the point to <BR>> establish a baseline
standard that wasn't necessarily <BR>> (mysteriously and apparently
arbitrarily) originally there, <BR>> the better to establish a defined and
quasi rational starting <BR>> point?<BR> <BR><BR>Not necessarily
in this thread, good point of clarification, thanks. I was responding and
querying under the premise (possibly erroneous) that Fenton was
wanting to duplicate what was done at the factory as opposed to
assuming nothing was done exactly to spec at the factory. The latter being the
more rational/logical approach in
my opinion.<BR><BR> <BR> >You're hoggin' the sucker out to a
new system reset that lets you do it your way <BR>> whatever was originally
there, I'd hope. <BR> <BR>Yeah, I'd hope so
too.<BR> <BR><BR> <BR><BR><BR><BR>
<DIV><EM><FONT color=#330033><FONT face="Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif"
color=#330000>
Michael C. Spreeman </FONT><BR></FONT></EM><FONT color=#000066><A
href="http://www.spreemanpianoinnovations.com/">http://www.spreemanpianoinnovations.com</A></FONT></DIV><BR><BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 23:29:22 -0500<BR>> From:
rnossaman@cox.net<BR>> To: pianotech@ptg.org<BR>> Subject: Re: Doweled
and Fully Fit Pinblocks<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> > Can we back up a step?
How are y'all removing your original blocks? <BR>> > I've seen 3 styles
of Stnwy stretchers. On the ones with an angle on the <BR>> > outer face
and perpendicular on the inner face, we had an angled piece <BR>> > of
spruce we would we would tape to the front of the stretcher in to run <BR>>
> the router along (with the Bolduc cutter). This results in a <BR>>
> perpendicular cut at the block joint.<BR>> > / Michael
Spreeman<BR>> <BR>> Ron N<BR><BR>
<HR>
Get more from your digital life. <A
href="http://www.windowslive.com/default.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Home2_082008"
target=_new>Find out how.</A> </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>