<font color='black' size='2' face='arial'><br>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: arial,helvetica; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3px"><PRE><TT><TT>About two weeks ago we were engaged by a serious amateur player to improve the
tone and touch on his 2005 Mason Hamlin CC (9'4")
concert grand. In the almost six years he's owned the instrument, he's had a
veritable parade of technicians here in southern California
do their best to make the instrument "sound bigger than a 6-foot instrument, and
to let me play it soft with good repetition" (owner's words.)
</TT></PRE></TT></BLOCKQUOTE></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>David</div>
<div> </div>
<div>You and your team obviously did a great job "remanufacturing" this piano so that it sounds and plays like a real 9'4" piano. The question that came to my mind was, why didn't the owner of the piano ask M&H to make the piano better? Or get his money back.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>WIm <br>
<br>
</div>
<div style="CLEAR: both"></div>
<br>
<br>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: arial,helvetica; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">-----Original Message-----<br>
From: David Andersen <david@davidandersenpianos.com><br>
To: Pianotech Pianotech <pianotech@ptg.org><br>
Sent: Sun, Apr 3, 2011 1:20 pm<br>
Subject: [pianotech] Big challenge met(finally)<br>
<br>
<div style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff; MARGIN: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif; COLOR: #000; FONT-SIZE: 12px" id=AOLMsgPart_0_51e05807-11cc-453c-aa43-f390cb307d52><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt"><TT>About two weeks ago we were engaged by a serious amateur player to improve the
tone and touch on his 2005 Mason Hamlin CC (9'4")
concert grand. In the almost six years he's owned the instrument, he's had a
veritable parade of technicians here in southern California
do their best to make the instrument "sound bigger than a 6-foot instrument, and
to let me play it soft with good repetition" (owner's words.)
Now the piano is in a beautiful performance space in mid-town L.A., and the
owner has a 7-foot Shigeru Kawai in his house, so the stark
difference between the pianos is truly glaring.
When I sat down and played it, it sounded like a really nice Yamaha C2(6'3") or
C5 (6'7") with a weird resistance at the bottom of the keystroke and a generally
mushy or indefinite feeling. I started to remember another M&H CC my partner
Steve Bellieu and I had worked on five or six years ago that was similar: better
feeling action, but a really "small" sound for such a big instrument. The
problem then? Short blow distance. Concert grands should have a minimum of 46mm
blow; if the action ratio and geometry can support 47 or 48mm, so much the
better.
So: on to diagnostics in the present day----
-Board eval.: good sustain, good bloom in all sections; positive crown, positive
bearing
-Blow distance: 39mm (Huh?!!?)
-Key travel:        9.75mm (shallow; we prefer 10.25-10.5mm)
-Action ratio via Erwin's Ratio Gauge: over 6.0, less than 6.5 (way too high for
a modern action,
        and a huge disparity in ratio between sharps and naturals)
-Downweight: 55-58gm
-Upweight: 30-32gm
-Balance Weight: 42.5-45.0 (too heavy, too resistant; we never like to go beyond
a 39.0 balance weight)
-Action spread: 112.60mm (OK; ideal is 112.75mm)
-Key leads: very light; one lead in #6; one lead in #20; three leads in the low
sharps; back leads ( behind the balance rail) in keys 66-88
The shanks were resting or barely off the cushions, so we realized quickly we
would have to cut into something important to make this work: the stack was too
high. The ratio was too high. Somebody had cut the hammers way, way down in the
tail; everything was cacked up.
What we did:
-lowered the back of the stack 2mm
-lowered the front of the stack + - 4mm
-moved and custom-set the capstan line (different positions for sharp and
natural capstans)
-re-weighed the keys (added more lead)
-peeled back the shank rest cushions (took off about 3 mm of material)
-set key travel at 10.5mm
-put Crescendo (white Wurzen felt) punchings on the front rail
-reglued six hammerheads in the bass that had come loose from the molding
-parts-to-strings alignment
-bed keyframe, complete action regulation
-final blow distance: 47.5mm in bass, 46.5mm in tenor and treble
-added mini-binder clips to shanks on wound strings
-final Balance Weight: 36.5 in tenor and treble, 38.5 in the bass
-regulated pedals, timed dampers
-tightened plate bolts
-Voiced it
-Tuned it
Final tone: way, way bigger and fatter---now it sounds like a balanced 9-foot
piano with a good (not huge) bass
Final touch: buttery, light, fast, and responsive; repeats with excellence at
all volumes
Later, we'll dry-fit test some different hammers on the thing---new Renner
BluePoints and Ronsen 14-lb. Weickerts---with the owner present and see if we
can sell that work.
I can't wait until he puts his hands on it on Tuesday morning...I LOVE the
reactions at that time, 'cuz it's literally a different piano;
huge wow factor.
Moral: if a new-ish piano sounds and feels like sh**t, and the board is good,
doing more regulation, lubrication, and voicing without changing the
foundational relationships so they comply is like moving deck chairs around on
the Titanic---some well-known area techs tried repeatedly and failed to improve
this piano. The owner told me he's spent "thousands" over the past five years on
attempts to make the piano sound and feel better, although (appropriately, IMO)
he declined to name the attemptees.
Scary.
The big take-aways?
1) If you are unable to do the kind of work described above, ASK FOR HELP.
Consult with a tech/rebuilder who can.
2) EVERY SINGLE MILLIMETER OF BLOW DISTANCE YOU CAN EEK OUT, GO FOR IT.
Shortened blow distances have
a devastating effect on the tone and power of a grand piano.
3) It pays to develop your diagnostic skills. Three techs made good money for
their involvement in this job---their hourly rate at full retail.
Collaboration is king.
Best,
David Andersen
Los Angeles
</TT></PRE></div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_0_51e05807-11cc-453c-aa43-f390cb307d52 --></div>
</font>