Right. The PTG provides and maintains the list, emphasizing my point. Why should non-members have a say in the disposition of the list? It doesn't mean their contributions are not worthwhile, but I just can't understand why organizational decisions should be directed by those outside the organization. Can you suggest a logical reason it should be so?<div>
<br></div><div>WRM</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Ron Koval <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:drwoodwind@hotmail.com" target="_blank">drwoodwind@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
>From William R Monroe:<br>
<snip>I'm just growing weary of all the complaints from folks who refuse to be on PTG-L<snip><br>
Interesting take on the issue of communication to the people on the list about whenthe list will be killed.<br>
<br>
In case you forgot: (from "about this list")<br>
The "pianotech" list, provided as a community service by the Piano Technicians Guild, is a forum for piano technicians. The list resides on the PTG server and is maintained by the PTG, but the PTG does not control the content in any way. The "pianotech" list is an open list, allowing anyone to subscribe or submit posts. <br>
The same cannot be said about PTG-L(and I AM subscribed to that list - there are others on pianotech that can't)<br>
<span><font color="#888888">Ron Koval<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br>
</div>