I think the problem is this Board of Directors is too emotionally invested in the new and improved product because they have spent so much time, energy, and (our)$$ on it. The only hope would be to elect a new board who isn't so invested in it. I keep thinking that we've had a poorly designed/manufactured piano delivered to us and the leadership keeps trying to convince us that it just needs a little more regulating and "playing in". I would like to see the whole thing scrapped and start over with something that works and that the membership wants. <br>
<br>Ryan<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Ron Nossaman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rnossaman@cox.net">rnossaman@cox.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On 12/31/2011 1:02 PM, David Boyce wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Yes indeed. We'll all be 'unsubscribed' when this list is finally<br>
terminated, after all....<br>
<br>
David.<br>
<a href="http://www.davidboyce.co.uk" target="_blank">www.davidboyce.co.uk</a><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Aw, shucks, hang around until the list is history. I plan to.<br>
<br>
Joy!<br>
<br>
Elwood<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
<br>
<br></div></div>
And as I keep attempting to point out, if we could get anyone responsible to take interest in *requiring* HL to make their "legacy" option actually work, we would have equivalent function in the new system and would have no real need of either the old pianotech list, or HL's much admired social networking site.<br>
Ron N<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Ryan Sowers, RPT<br>Puget Sound Chapter<br>Olympia, WA<br><a href="http://www.pianova.net">www.pianova.net</a><br>