<html>
<body>
Patrick,<br>
With all due respect to you and to Paul Adams, in this case, the RVP is
totally irrelevant, unless he's willing to respond (on PTG-L) and add
leverage NOW to get some sort of dialogue going. Am I to
assume that, up to now, he has been unaware of what's been going
on? I don't. Unless he has specific expertise in the
technology in question, or has specific information about what's going on
that he can share, he becomes yet another level of obfuscation. The
issue is not what happens at a meeting in a few weeks. It's about
whether there's an administrative structure that has the imagination and
capacity to respond to (some) of it's community in a meaningful and
timely manner. Remember, as an OPEN list that includes PTG members
and non-members, the responsibilities of the list administration falls
somewhat outside of their role within the organization itself.<br><br>
Regards,<br>
David Skolnik<br>
Hastings on Hudson, NY<br><br>
At 06:44 AM 1/6/2012, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Your RVP is certainly an
appropriate person to address your concerns to. The PTG Board will be
meeting in few weeks; now is the time to convey your suggestions and
opinions. Not just via email lists; give him a phone call.<br>
Patrick Draine RPT<br><br>
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:27 AM, David Skolnik
<<a href="mailto:davidskolnik@optonline.net">
davidskolnik@optonline.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<dl>
<dd>Who's responsibility is it to address the concerns that keep being
posted here? If not Jim Moy, or Phil Bondi, or Paul Brown, maybe
they could at least tell us. Meanwhile, I'll ask over at
PTG-L.<br><br>
<br>
<dd>David Skolnik<br>
<dd>Hastings on Hudson, NY<br>
</dl></blockquote></body>
<br>
</html>