<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue><div class=WordSection1>Your sarcasm notwithstanding, Terry, what you have been hearing from multiple people on this forum is that the damper levers do break and wear out.  They will be problematic to your customer and perhaps therefore you, because this has been the longtime experience of many people.  The damper levers are a flawed design, which is why they wear out.  It is one of the very worst aspects of the design of the old Steinway uprights.  That doesn’t mean that you are being over thorough and need to rebuild the entire people, that’s a separate judgment to be made based on the condition of each of those components.<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>The customer’s budget and amount of use are of course part of the equation.  Sometimes the needs of the piano and the needs of the owner are compatible, sometimes not.  <o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>Will Truitt<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of Delwin D Fandrich Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 4:06 PM To: pianotech@ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Replacing dampers on a 1908 Steinway Upright<o:p></o:p></div></div><o:p> </o:p>I’ve replaced all of the parts on these things a couple of times. I’ll never do it again. WN&G was showing a composite vertical action at the recent NAMM show. If I were interested in replacing the action in one of these old beasts I’d sure be bugging Bruce about availability….<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>ddf<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p><div>Delwin D Fandrich<o:p></o:p>Piano Design & Fabrication<o:p></o:p>6939 Foothill Court SW, Olympia, Washington 98512 USA<o:p></o:p>Phone  360.515.0119 — Cell  360.388.6525<o:p></o:p><a href="mailto:del@fandrichpiano.com">del@fandrichpiano.com </a>— <a href="mailto:ddfandrich@gmail.com">ddfandrich@gmail.com</a><o:p></o:p></div><o:p> </o:p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>From: <a href="mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org">pianotech-bounces@ptg.org</a> <a href="mailto:[mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]">[mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]</a> On Behalf Of Don Hubbs Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 12:43 PM To: <a href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</a> Subject: Re: [pianotech] Replacing dampers on a 1908 Steinway Upright<o:p></o:p></div></div><o:p> </o:p>As long as you don’t mind running back there multiple times to fix the next one that goes, and the customer doesn’t mind paying you repeatedly, then you can keep gluing little pieces of veneer to the edges of the damper levers, fitting oversized pins in the damper flanges and otherwise doing half-fast repairs. These old Steinway actions will suck you in and chew you up. If you aren’t going to do it right the first time, prepare the customer for ongoing service calls.<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>These are superior old pianos, but most of them have been played to death and yes, they often do need more action parts than can be economically justified. Is there any source for less expensive parts? Dealers can buy complete sets of hammers mounted on shanks and flanges for new asian pianos for less than $200. Has anyone modified these old actions to accept standard parts? The old V with the wooden damper lifters is the worst to work on..<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>I have 4 of these in my shop right now that I am trying to decide what to do with.<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>Don Hubbs<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p><div><div style='margin-left:.5in'><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><hr size=2 width="100%" align=center></div></div>From: pianolover 88 <a href="mailto:[mailto:pianolover88@hotmail.com]">[mailto:pianolover88@hotmail.com]</a> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 7:55 PM To: <a href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</a> Subject: Re: [pianotech] Replacing dampers on a 1908 Steinway Upright<o:p></o:p></div><o:p> </o:p><div>You're so right! And it made me think, my god!!!, what about ALL the other delicate, aging parts, like the pinblock, strings, soundboard, bridges, whips, jacks, butts, springs, trapwork...EVERYTHING MUST BE REPLACED!!!! I couldn't live with it if I didn't do a TOTAL rebuild, on the chance that SOMETHING might fail, fall apart, stop working perfectly, ect. Thank you Wim for showing me the light! How could I have been so blind!? And besides, the owners are elderly, retired, play the piano rarely, and live on a limited fixed income. But it's for their own good! My new motto: It's ALL or NOTHING!  <img border=0 width=19 height=19 id="_x0000_i1026" src="http://gfx2.hotmail.com/mail/w4/pr04/ltr/emo/rotfl.gif" alt="Rolling on the floor laughing"> Cheers! Terry "UniGeezer" Peterson "Over 50, and not '2' Tired!" <a href="http://unigeezer.com/" target="_blank">www.unigeezer.com</a><o:p></o:p><div><div style='margin-left:.5in'><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><hr size=2 width="100%" align=center></div></div>To: <a href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</a> From: <a href="mailto:tnrwim@aol.com">tnrwim@aol.com</a> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:46:13 -0500 Subject: Re: [pianotech] Replacing dampers on a 1908 Steinway Upright<o:p></o:p><div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 2.0pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'>The general consensus I've gathered from various sources seems clear; "if you can <a href="http://www.grammarist.com/usage/make-do-make-due/" target="_blank">make do</a> with what's already there, i.e., the original dampers, DON'T try to replace them!!! You may make matters far worse, and dig yourself into an ever-deepening hole!" Cheers, Terry "UniGeezer" Peterson<o:p></o:p></blockquote></div><div> Terry<o:p></o:p></div><div>The general consensus I got from all the posts was that it is easier, and a lot cheaper in the long run, to replace the levers now, than wait until the customer complains that the dampers aren't working, and when you try to adjust them, they start breaking. <o:p></o:p></div><div> <o:p></o:p></div><div>But, hey, you asked for advice. Who are we to tell you you have to do what we recommend. <o:p></o:p></div><div> <o:p></o:p></div><div>Good luck<o:p></o:p></div><div> <o:p></o:p></div><div>Wim<o:p></o:p></div><div><div> <o:p></o:p></div></div><o:p> </o:p><div>-----Original Message----- From: pianolover 88 <<a href="mailto:pianolover88@hotmail.com">pianolover88@hotmail.com</a>> To: pianotech <<a href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</a>> Sent: Tue, Feb 7, 2012 1:59 pm Subject: Re: [pianotech] Replacing dampers on a 1908 Steinway Upright<o:p></o:p><div id="ecxAOLMsgPart_1_ba36d2c3-23bc-40a5-b389-916fa99ba5f6"><div>The general consensus I've gathered from various sources seems clear; "if you can <a href="http://www.grammarist.com/usage/make-do-make-due/" target="_blank">make do</a> with what's already there, i.e., the original dampers, DON'T try to replace them!!! You may make matters far worse, and dig yourself into an ever-deepening hole!" Cheers, Terry "UniGeezer" Peterson "Over 50, and not '2' Tired!" <a href="http://unigeezer.com/" target="_blank">www.unigeezer.com</a><o:p></o:p><div>> From: <a href="mailto:joegarrett@earthlink.net">joegarrett@earthlink.net</a> > To: <a href="mailto:encorepianos@metrocast.net">encorepianos@metrocast.net</a>; <a href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</a> > Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:21:35 -0800 > Subject: Re: [pianotech] Replacing dampers on a 1908 Steinway Upright > > Will, > Are you playing Devil's Advocate?<G> > See my answers below > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Encore Pianos <<a href="mailto:encorepianos@metrocast.net">encorepianos@metrocast.net</a>> > > To: <<a href="mailto:joegarrett@earthlink.net">joegarrett@earthlink.net</a>> > > Date: 2/6/2012 8:05:09 PM > > Subject: RE: [pianotech] Replacing dampers on a 1908 Steinway Upright > > > > Well, Steinway altered the design on the K-52's to a larger damper. Who > > decides what it was intended to be? Steinway changed the design, so they > > must have decided that the earlier one wasn't what they intended it to be. > > If you really knew the real story, you wouldn't be making that statement or > question. Truth is: They discontinued manufaccturing the K-52. And, as the > story goes, tossed out all of the original plans/jigs/fixtures,etc. Then, > years later, they decided that was a bad decision and decided to start > making that model again. They started with an olde one, that was not in > very good shape and tried to replicate it. However, they decided to use > Pratt-Win keys and actions instead of the original stuff. BIG FUBAR!!! > (this was during the time of TEFLON) I suspect there are still a few of > those turkeys out there.<G> Then, they decided to use Renner parts. It has > morphed into what it is today. Is it as good as the original design? I > don't think so! It's close, but it just ain't the same. The originals > had/have a beautiful singing quality throughout the scale. The new ones > seem to be somewhat lacking imo. > > > > The history of piano design was evolutionary up to the last hundred years > or > > so. Who decides when it has been perfected? > > That, sir, is a totally ridiculous question that I will not justify with my > answer!!! > > > > What is "too much damping"? Be specific on the amount, and how that is > > measured. > > Will, Go to bed and think about it, before asking, yet another stupid > question! > Respectfully, > Joe > > > > Will Truitt > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joseph Garrett [<a href="mailto:joegarrett@earthlink.net?">mailto:joegarrett@earthlink.net</a>] > > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 10:07 PM > > To: Encore Pianos; <a href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</a> > > Subject: RE: [pianotech] Replacing dampers on a 1908 Steinway Upright > > > > Will, > > I disagree. But, suit yourself. > > My thought is this: Too much damping is just as bad as not enough. > > Most techs dislike over-damper pianos, because they do not dampen like the > > pianos they work on. Big mistake. The intended overall sound of the > > instrument is altered significantly when we attempt to make it something > it > > was not intended to be. That's my take on this. It's served me well. > > Best, > > Joe > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > From: Encore Pianos <<a href="mailto:encorepianos@metrocast.net">encorepianos@metrocast.net</a>> > > > To: <<a href="mailto:joegarrett@earthlink.net">joegarrett@earthlink.net</a>>; <<a href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</a>> > > > Date: 2/6/2012 6:36:19 PM > > > Subject: RE: [pianotech] Replacing dampers on a 1908 Steinway Upright > > > > > > The Tokiwa kit or equivalent is superior in damping to the original > > design. > > > The original dampers are too small to damp as effectively as the > > > longer > > bass > > > and tenor dampers of the kit. The new Steinway upright dampers are > > > longer than the old for that reason and damp better. > > > > > > Will Truitt > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: <a href="mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org">pianotech-bounces@ptg.org</a> [<a href="mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org?">mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org</a>] On > > Behalf > > > Of Joseph Garrett > > > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 8:57 PM > > > To: pianotech > > > Subject: Re: [pianotech] Replacing dampers on a 1908 Steinway Upright > > > > > > Terri the Uni-Geezer asked: > > > "I"m replacing worn hammers and *dampers* on a client's old Steinway > > > upright, circa 1908. Having never replaced dampers on this particular > > model, > > > I was unaware that--apparently--replacing dampers on this piano is a > > > NIGHTMARE, and one of the most difficult damper jobs of ANY piano, > > > either upright or grand. Is this true? This gloomy scenario was > > > communicated to > > me > > > by a tech who works at a local piano supply house, but I'd rather not > > > mention who. > > > > > > I was told that the felts, especially the treble, are 'tapered' and > > > that > > you > > > must "peel little layers off as you work your way up", or they won't > > > lift properly, and won't dampen correctly. Basically I was told that > > > ALL the dampers are almost impossible to get right with modern day > > > replacements, without significant modification. Pics attached are from > > > the action > > showing > > > the dampers. I would appreciate ANY advice the forum member may have, > > > and what you might suggest, short of declining the job! > > > > > > PS: Brooks LTD told me that the Tokiwa TDVK damper kit (pic also > > > attached) would work well. Your thoughts on this would also be > > appreciated." > > > > > > Terry "UniGeezer" Peterson, > > > > > > Replicating is far less difficult than climbing that big-ass hill!<G> > > > So, suck it up and reproduce exactly what is there. If you do not have > > > the necessary damper felt, (in strips and sets), the Guillotine > > > cutter, Hot > > Glue > > > Pot and other assorted tools necessary to that job, get them or farm > > > it > > out > > > to someone who can do the job correctly. The Tokiwa set may work. > > > Then again, maybe not. I've done several of these actions.. They ARE > > > the most difficult to work on, IMHO, so meticulous work is required. > > > OR, you will have the biggest nightmare of your piano loving career. > > > (I've had to clean up the mess of others that did not take this > > > advice...not a fun gig fer sur.) However, this is a worthy effort, > > > since the Steinway Uprights of that design/era were, IMO, some of the > > > best, ever. Yes, they are cranky critters, but the end result can be > > extremely gratifying/satisfying. > > > So........Go For It Big Uni-Geezer Dude!<G> Best, Joe P.S. > > > If you need specific help, feel free to call me. > > > > > > > > > Joe Garrett, R.P.T. > > > Captain of the Tool Police > > > Squares R I > > > > > > > > > > > <o:p></o:p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>