<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 5/11/2012 4:52 AM, Ron Nossaman wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4FACFD77.10102@cox.net" type="cite">Somehow,
the presumption among ETD users is that aural tuning is stressful,
yet aural tuners don't complain about stress and wish they had an
ETD. Maybe it's just the aural tuners who do find it stressful who
adopt ETDs as a result. A few ETD users I know went back to aural
because they found it more satisfying. Doesn't matter at all
either way, but I think the fewer false premises that are repeated
and pounded as truths, the better.
</blockquote>
<font size="+1"><font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace"><br>
Concur. I don't understand the "stressful" argument at all. Is
it stressful for a duck to float on a pond? <br>
<br>
Maybe ETD tuners trying to tune aurally (not the ones who tuned
aurally for years, the ones who never really got familiar with
the process) use TOO MANY checks? That could slow them down and
stress them out. One uses tests to resolve anomalies in a
tuning, not multiple tests for every note and interval. Well,
this "one" does. <br>
<br>
I don't really understand the "time" argument, either. Doesn't
it take time to watch the lights? <br>
<br>
Susan<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></font>
</body>
</html>