<font color='black' size='2' face='arial'>
<div>I for one am interested in CTEs' responses to this question of David Love's (and the request by Will Truitt).</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thank you in advance... Bill Fritz, St Louis</div>
<div> </div>
<div><snip> </div>
<div>As for the answer to your final question, I think that is best left to those <br>
out there who have been CTE's who hopefully are reading this correspondence. <br>
They could certainly give you a far more intelligent answer than I could <br>
venture, given a body of experience testing candidates of all levels of <br>
experience, expertise, and "holes" in their knowledge base. I hope they will <br>
chime in with their thoughts. <br>
<br>
Will Truitt<br>
</div>
<div><snip> </div>
<div>So back to the real question. If aural tuning tends to deliver less consistent <br>
results in the temperament and octave sections than electronic tuning, then why <br>
do we insist that the testing in those sections be done aurally and exclude a <br>
purely electronic approach?<br>
</div>
<div>David Love</div>
</font>