<div dir="ltr">Gee whillikers, Joe. :-)<div><br></div><div style>A good web-based system is not really all that complicated, and offers a lot of benefits. I'm not talking about Higher Logic, which is clunky at best.</div> <div style><br></div><div style>I'm curious as to how many web-based systems you've visited in the last year. Which ones were so bad?</div><div style><br></div><div style>-- <br><div>John Formsma, RPT<br></div><div> Blue Mountain, MS</div></div><div style><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Joseph Garrett <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joegarrett@earthlink.net" target="_blank">joegarrett@earthlink.net</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Kent said: "Yes, but it appears to be a _good_ web-based system. 8^) And at<br> least email _replies_ are supported, and from within the Gmail apps,<br> replies are even more simple. "<br> <br> Kent,<br> It's obvious you still don't get it. Any "web -based system" is not going<br> to cut it! It requires many more "steps" to achieve what we have at<br> present. AND, it makes most aspects of our current system far more<br> complicated! I for one, would NEVER participate in that sort of "system"!<br> It's a pain in the ass, to put it in plain language!<br> Joe<br> <br> <br> Joe Garrett, R.P.T.<br> Captain of the Tool Police<br> Squares R I<br> <br> </blockquote></div><br><br> </div></div>